UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
| ☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | ☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | ||
| ☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | ||||
| ☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | ||||
| ☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
INNOSPEC INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
| ☒ | No fee required |
| ☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials |
| ☐ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 |
2026 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
INNOSPEC INC. 8310 South Valley Highway, Suite 350, Englewood, CO 80112
NOTICE OF 2026 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
|
Date and time |
||
|
Friday, May 8, 2026, 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time |
|
|
Location |
||
|
The St. Regis New York |
|
|
Record Date |
||
|
March 13, 2026 |
|
|
Proposals |
Proposal 1 |
Election of two Class I Directors |
|
Proposal 2 |
Advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation |
|
|
Proposal 3 |
Ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm |
|
|
To obtain Proxy Materials |
|
www.envisionreports.com/iosp (for stockholders of record) www.edocumentview.com/iosp (for beneficial owners with shares held in “street name”) |
|
Call 1-866-641-4276 (for stockholders of record) Call 1-800-579-1639 (for beneficial owners with shares held in “street name”) |
|
|
[email protected] with “Proxy Materials Innospec Inc.” in the subject line (for stockholders of record) [email protected] (for beneficial owners with shares held in “street name”) |
|
|
Voting Methods |
|
www.envisionreports.com/iosp (for stockholders of record) www.proxyvote.com (for beneficial owners with shares held in “street name”) |
|
Call the toll-free number 1-800-652-8683 |
|
|
Complete and return a proxy card (if you received a paper copy) |
|
|
Attend and vote at the Annual Meeting |
|
Stockholders may also transact any other business properly brought before the meeting. At this time, the Board of Directors knows of no other proposals or matters to be presented.
On behalf of the Board of Directors:
David B. Jones
Senior Vice President, General Counsel,
Chief Compliance Officer, and Corporate Secretary
March 26, 2026
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Page No. |
|
INFORMATION ABOUT THE 2026 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND VOTING AT THE MEETING |
1 |
|
7 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
▶Copies of Code of Conduct, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Committee Charters |
18 |
|
18 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
36 |
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Page No. |
|
42 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
WHO OWNS OUR STOCK? INFORMATION ABOUT OUR COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP |
46 |
|
▶Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers as of February 15, 2026 |
46 |
|
47 |
|
|
47 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY APPROVAL OF INNOSPEC’S |
49 |
|
50 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
51 |
|
|
52 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
58 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
73 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
88 |
|
|
89 |
|
|
89 |
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ PROPOSALS FOR THE 2027 ANNUAL MEETING |
90 |
|
| 1 |
PROXYSTATEMENT
INFORMATIONABOUTTHE2026ANNUALMEETINGOF STOCKHOLDERS AND VOTING AT THE MEETING
WhydidyousendmetheNoticeRegardingtheAvailabilityofProxyMaterials?
We sent you the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) because the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Innospec Inc. (“Innospec” or the “Company”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 2026 Annual MeetingofStockholders,whichwillbeheldonFriday,May8,2026at10.00a.m.EasternTime,atThe St. Regis New York, Two East 55th Street, at Fifth Avenue, New York, USA, 10022.
This Proxy Statement summarizes the information you need to vote at the Annual Meeting. You do not need to attendtheAnnualMeetingtovoteyourstock.Alternatively,youmaysimplyvotebytelephone,overtheinternet,or, if you have requested written proxy materials, by completing, signing and returning the accompanying proxy card.
InnospecintendstocommencedistributionoftheNoticetostockholdersonoraboutMarch27, 2026.
WhatproposalswillbevotedonattheAnnualMeetingof Stockholders?
You are being asked to consider and vote on three proposals at the Annual Meeting. The following is a summary of the proposals and the voting recommendations of the Board with respect to each proposal:
|
NO. |
PROPOSAL |
|
HOW THE BOARD |
MORE |
|
|
1 |
Election of two Class I Directors |
|
|
FOR ALL NOMINEES |
Page 32 |
|
2 |
Advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation |
|
|
FOR |
Page 49 |
|
3 |
Ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm |
|
|
FOR |
Page 50 |
Important notice regarding availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
held on May 8, 2026.
|
| 2 |
Areproxymaterialsavailableontheinternet?
Yes. This Proxy Statement, and the proxy card, for the Annual Meeting and our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K areavailableatwww.envisionreports.com/iospforstockholdersofrecordandwww.edocumentview.com/iospfor beneficial owners.
Whoisentitledtovoteatthe meeting?
March 13, 2026 is the record date for the Annual Meeting. If you owned Innospec Common Stock at the close of businessonMarch13,2026,youareentitledtovote.Onthisrecorddate,wehad 24,890,467sharesofourCommon Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Our Common Stock is our only class of voting stock.
HowmanyvotesdoI have?
YouhaveonevoteforeachshareofCommonStockthatyouownedatthecloseofbusinessontheMarch13,2026 record date. Your Notice indicates the number of shares of Common Stock you are entitled to vote.
Whatisthedifferencebetweenholdingstockasastockholderofrecordandasabeneficial owner?
Althoughmanystockholdersaretherecordholdersoftheirstock,othersholdtheirstockbeneficially,whichmeans it is held through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in the stockholder’s own name. As summarized below, there are some differences between stock held of record and stock owned beneficially.
Stockholderof Record
IfyoursharesofCommonStockareregistereddirectlyinyournamewithourtransferagent,Computershare,youare considered,withrespecttothoseshares,thestockholderofrecordandtheNoticeisbeingsenttoyoudirectlyatyour addressofrecord.Asthestockholderofrecord,youhavetherighttograntyourvotingproxydirectlytoInnospecby votingbytelephoneorviatheinternet,or,ifyouhaverequestedwrittenmaterials,bysigning,datingandreturning yourproxycardtoInnospec.Alternatively,youmayvoteinpersonattheAnnualMeeting.Formoreinformationon voting by telephone or via the internet see the description below under the heading “Information about the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Voting at the Meeting - May I vote by telephone or via the internet?”.
BeneficialOwner
If your Common Stock is held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficialownerofstockheldin“streetname”andourproxymaterialsarebeingforwardedtoyoubyyourbroker ornomineewhoisconsideredthestockholderofrecordwithrespecttothoseshares.Asthebeneficialowner, you have the right to direct your broker or nominee on how to vote your stock and are also invited to attend the AnnualMeeting.However,sinceyouarenotthestockholderofrecord,youmayonlyvotethesesharesattheAnnual Meeting if you follow the instructions described below under the heading “Information about the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Voting at the Meeting - How do I attend and vote at the Annual Meeting?”.
Your broker or nominee has provided a voting instruction card for you to use in directing your broker or nomineeas to how to vote your stock. You may also vote by telephone or via the internet by following your broker or other nominee’s directions as described below under the heading “Information about the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Voting at the Meeting - May I vote by telephone or via the internet?”.
HowdoIvotebyproxyifIamastockholderofrecord?
Ifyouareastockholderofrecordandyourequestaphysicalproxycardandproperlyfillinsuchproxycardanditis completedandreceivedbyus(andnotrevoked)priortotheAnnualMeeting,oryouvotebyinternetortelephone, your“proxy”(i.e.,oneoftheindividualsnamedonyourproxycard)willvoteyourstockasyouhavedirected.Ifyou sign the proxy card (including by electronic signature in the case of internet or telephonic voting), but do not make specificvotingchoices,thepersonholdingyourproxywillvoteyourstockasrecommendedbytheBoardasfollows:
|
| 3 |
“FOR”theelectionoftwoClassI Directors;
“FOR”theapproval,onanadvisorybasis,oftheCompany’sexecutivecompensation;and
“FOR”theratificationoftheappointmentoftheCompany’sindependentregisteredpublicaccountingfirm.
IfanyothermatterispresentedattheAnnualMeeting,yourvotewillbecastinaccordancewiththebestjudgment of the individuals named on your proxy card. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, we know of no such other matters that need to be acted on at the Annual Meeting.
HowdoIgivevotinginstructionsifIamabeneficialowner?
If you are a beneficial owner of stock, your broker will communicate with you directly and ask you how you want your stock to be voted. If you give the broker voting instructions, the broker will vote your stock as you direct. If you do not givethe brokervoting instructions, one oftwothings canhappen, depending onthe typeofproposal in question. Brokers have discretionary power to vote your stock with respect to “routine” matters, but they do not have discretionary power to vote your stock on “non-routine” matters. Brokers holding stock beneficially ownedby their clients do not have the ability to cast votes with respect to the election and ratification of directors or executivecompensationunlesstheyhavereceivedinstructionsfromthebeneficialownerofthestockbecausethese areconsidered“non-routine”matters.Itisthereforeimportantthatyouprovidevotinginstructionstoyourbroker ifyoursharesofCommonStockareheldbeneficiallythroughabrokersothatyourvotewithrespecttodirectors and executive compensation, and any other matter treated as “non-routine”, is counted.
MayIvotebytelephoneorviatheinternet?
Yes, you may vote by telephone or via the internet up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the Annual Meetingdate.Weencourageyoutodosobecauseyourvotewillbetabulatedfasterthanifyoumailedit.Pleasenote thefollowingdependingonwhetheryouareastockholderofrecordorabeneficialownerwhosesharesareheldby a bank or broker in “street name”:
Ifyouareastockholderofrecord,youmayvoteelectronicallythroughtheinternetatwww.envisionreports.com/iosp orbytelephoneTollFree1-800-652-8683withintheU.S.A.,U.S.TerritoriesandCanada.Besuretohaveyourcontrol number, which appears on your Notice or proxy card, with you when you vote.
Ifyouareabeneficialownerandholdyourstockin“streetname”,youmayvoteelectronicallythroughtheinternet atwww.proxyvote.comandyoushouldcontactyourbankorbrokertodeterminewhetheryouwillbeabletovote bytelephone.Besuretohaveyourcontrolnumber,whichappearsonyourNoticeorproxycard,withyouwhenyou vote.
WhetherornotyouplantoattendtheAnnualMeeting,weurgeyoutovote.Doingsobyreturningtheproxycardor voting by telephone or via the internet will not affect your ultimate right to attend and vote at the meeting.
MayIrevokemyproxy?
Yes.Ifyouchangeyourmindafteryouvote,youmayrevokeyourproxybyfollowinganyoftheproceduresdescribed below. To revoke your proxy:
•Sendinanothersignedproxywithalaterdateorresubmityourvotebytelephoneorthe internet;
•SendaletterrevokingyourproxytoMr.DavidB.Jones,SeniorVicePresident,GeneralCounsel,ChiefCompliance OfficerandCorporateSecretaryatInnospecInc.,8310SouthValleyHighway,Suite350,Englewood,CO80112;or
•AttendtheAnnualMeetingandvoteinaccordancewiththeinstructionsdescribedbelow.
If you wish to revoke your proxy, you must do so sufficiently in advance to permit the necessary examination and tabulation of the subsequent proxy or revocation before the vote is taken.
|
| 4 |
HowdoIattendandvoteatthe2026AnnualMeeting?
If you are a stockholder of record, you may attend the meeting and vote your shares in person. If you choose to do so, please bring your Notice, or proxy card showing your control number and proof of identification.
Ifyouarethebeneficialownerofstockheldin“streetname”,youmayvoteyoursharesinpersononlyifyouobtain asignedproxyfromthestockholderofrecordgivingyoutherighttovotethestock.Todoso,youmustbringtothe 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders proof of identification, an account statement or letter from the broker, bank or other nominee indicating that you are the owner of the stock and a signed proxy from the stockholder of record givingyoutherighttovotethestock.Theaccountstatementorlettermustshowthatyouwerethebeneficialowner of the stock on the Record Date.
Evenifyouplantoattendthe2026AnnualMeetingofStockholdersinperson,Innospecrecommendsthatyouvote yourstockinadvancebyinternetortelephone,orbyreturningtheaccompanyingproxycard,asdescribedabove,so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Isastockholderlistavailableforexamination?
For 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting, a complete list of stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder for any purpose relevant to the Annual Meeting. Stockholders may view the list at Innospec’s corporate headquarters at 8310 South Valley Highway, Suite 350, Englewood, CO 80112duringofficehoursandshowingtheircontrolnumberandphotoidentification.Thestockholderslistwillalso be available during the Annual Meeting.
WhatvotesneedtobepresenttoholdtheAnnualMeeting?
To have a quorum for our Annual Meeting, the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding andentitledtovoteneedtobepresentorrepresentedbyproxy.Abstentionsandbroker“non-votes”aretreatedas present and entitled to vote and are counted in determining whether we have a quorum.
Whatvoteisrequiredtoapproveeachproposal?
|
Proposal |
How many votes are required? |
Is broker discretionary voting allowed? |
|
|
Proposal1 |
Election of two Class I Directors |
Plurality of votes of shares present or represented by proxy* |
No |
|
Proposal2 |
Advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation |
Majority of the stock present or represented by proxy** |
No |
|
Proposal3 |
Ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm |
Majority of the stock present or represented by proxy |
Yes |
*While directors are elected by a plurality vote, we have a “majority vote” director resignation policy in place, as described on page 32.
**As Proposal 2 is an advisory vote, there is no specified vote requirement for approval. Innospec will consider that the affirmative vote of the majority of the stock present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on such proposal reflects the advice of the stockholders.
|
| 5 |
Howarevotescounted?
|
Proposal |
How your vote may be cast |
Is broker discretionary voting allowed? |
|
|
Proposal1 |
Election of two Class I Directors |
“FOR” each of the nominees or “WITHHELD”* with respect to one or more of the nominees** |
No |
|
Proposal2 |
Advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation |
“FOR”, “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” |
No |
|
Proposal3 |
Ratification of appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm |
“FOR”, “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” |
Yes |
*Ifyou“withhold”authoritytovotewithrespecttooneormorenomineesforInnospecDirector,yourvotewillhavenoeffectontheelectionof such nominees.
**Whiledirectorsareelectedbyapluralityvote,wehavea“majorityvote”directorresignationpolicyinplace,asdescribedonpage32.
If you sign (including electronic confirmations in the case of internet or telephone voting) your proxy card with no instructions on how to vote, your stock will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board. If you sign (including electronic confirmation in the case of internet or telephone voting) your broker voting instruction card withnoinstructionsonhowtovote,yourstockwillbevotedinthebroker’sdiscretiononlywithrespectto“routine” matters, but will not be voted with respect to “non-routine” matters. As described in “Information about the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Voting at the Meeting—How do I give voting instructions if I am a beneficial owner?”, election of directors and executive compensation are considered “non-routine” matters. We will appoint one or more inspectors of election to count votes cast by proxy.
Whatistheeffectofbrokernon-votesand abstentions?
Abroker“non-vote”occurswhenabrokerholdingstockforabeneficialownerdoesnotorcannotvoteonaparticular proposal because the broker does not have discretionary voting power for that particular proposal and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.
CommonStockownedbystockholderselectingtoabstainfromvotingwithrespecttoanyproposalwillbecounted towards the presence of a quorum. Common Stock beneficially owned and voted by the beneficiary through a brokerwillbecountedtowardsthepresenceofaquorum, eveniftherearebrokernon-voteswithrespecttosome proposals, as long as the broker votes on at least one “non-routine” proposal.
Abstentions and instructions to withhold votes with respect to any nominee for director election (which uses a plurality standard) will result in those nominees receiving fewer votes but will not count as votes “against” the nominee.Brokernon-voteswillnotbeconsideredpresentandentitledtovotewithrespecttoelectionsofdirectors and therefore will have no direct effect on the outcome of the election of directors. Abstentions will be treated as presentandentitledtovotewithrespecttoProposals2and3and,therefore,willhavetheeffectofvotes“against” these proposals. Broker non-votes will have no direct effect on the outcome of these proposals.
WhathappensiftheAnnualMeetingisadjournedorpostponed?
YourproxywillstillbeeffectiveandwillbevotedattherescheduledAnnualMeeting.Youwillstillbeabletochange or revoke your proxy until it is voted.
WherecanIfindthevotingresults?
FinalvotingresultswillbedisclosedinaForm8-KtobefiledwiththeU.S.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission(“SEC”) within four business days after the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If official results are not available at that time, we will provide preliminary voting results in the Form 8-K and will provide the final results in an amendment totheForm8-Kassoonastheybecomeavailable.YoucanfindtheForm8-Konourwebsiteatwww.innospec.com.
|
| 6 |
WillInnospec’sindependentaccountantsattendtheAnnualMeeting?
A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), our current independent registered public accounting firm,willbeavailablebytelephoneattheAnnualMeetingtoanswerquestionsandwillhaveanopportunitytomake a statement if such representative wishes.
DoDirectorsattendtheAnnual Meeting?
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that Directors are expected to attend our annual meetings of stockholders and any special meetings of stockholders called by Innospec to consider extraordinary business transactions.Unlesstheyareunabletodosoasaresultofspecialcircumstances,Directorsareencouragedtoattend all other special meetings of stockholders called by Innospec. All our Directors then in office attended the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that was held on May 9, 2025.
WhomshouldIcallifIhaveany questions?
If you have any questions about the Annual Meeting, voting or directions to attend the Annual Meeting, please contact Mr. David B. Jones, Innospec’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary.
|
| 7 |
CORPORATEGOVERNANCE
CorporateGovernanceHighlights
We are committed to good corporate governance, which promotes the long-term interests of our stakeholders, strengthens Board and management accountability, and helps build public trust in the Company. The Corporate Governance section below describes our governance framework, which includes the following highlights:
|
Independent Chairman |
Regular stockholder |
Anti-hedging and |
||
|
100% independent |
100% independent Board |
Separate Chairman of the |
||
|
Annual Board and Committee |
Regular sessions of independent, |
Long-standing commitment |
||
|
No over-boarding of Directors |
No stockholder rights plan |
Majority vote Director |
OurCorporateGovernanceFramework
CorporateGovernancePrinciples
InnospecplacesthestrongestemphasisonhighstandardsofCorporateGovernance.Wehavepoliciestoguideallour employees,Directorsandthird-partyrepresentativesandprovideextensivetrainingtohelpensurethatweoperate to these standards throughout the Company. Through its Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee, the Board evaluates our corporate governance policies and practices, which form our corporate governance framework, against evolving best practices as benchmarks for assessing that we follow appropriate standards when conducting our business.
One of the cornerstones of our Corporate Governance is transparency. Accordingly, you will find the following key policies and procedures on our website.
|
•Anti-Corruption Policy •Audit Committee Charter •Code of Conduct •Conflict Minerals Statement •Compensation Committee Charter •Corporate Governance Guidelines •Director Independence Policy |
•Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee Charter •Reporting Corporate Governance Concerns •Supplier Code of Conduct •Human Rights Policy Statement •Modern Slavery Statement |
|
Also available on our website are this Proxy Statement, our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K and our latest Sustainability Report, being our 2024 report. |
|
|
| 8 |
CorporateGovernanceGuidelines
Our Board believes that adherence to sound corporate governance policies and practices is important so that the Company is governed and managed with the highest standards of responsibility, ethics and integrity and by taking intoaccounttheinterestsofallstakeholders.WehaveadoptedasetofCorporateGovernanceGuidelinesintended to reflect a set of core values that provide the foundation for our governance and management systems and our interactions with others.
OurCorporateGovernanceGuidelinesaddresskeygovernancematters,including,butnotlimited to:
•SelectionandcompositionoftheBoard;
•Directororientationandcontinuingeducation;
•Boardmembershipcriteriaandselectionprocess;
•Boardoperations,includingthesizeoftheBoard,BoardindependenceandBoardcommittee structure;
•Directorresponsibilities;
•Executivesessionsofnon-employeeDirectors;
•PerformanceevaluationsoftheBoard,CommitteesoftheBoardandindividualDirectors;
•Directorcompensation;
•Directoraccesstomanagementandoutsideadvisors;
•Managementsuccession;
•ResignationpolicyinuncontestedDirectorelections; and
•LimitsonBoardmembersservingonotherpubliccompany boards.
The Board believes that corporate governance is an evolving process and generally reviews the Corporate GovernanceGuidelineseverytwoyearsandupdatesthemwhenappropriate.Acurrentcopyofthe Corporate Governance Guidelines can be found on our website under the heading Corporate Governance at www.innospec.com/about-us/corporate-governance, or by writing to Mr. David B. Jones, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary at Innospec Inc., 8310 South Valley Highway, Suite 350, Englewood, CO 80112.
Innospec’sLeadershipStructure
The Board believes that the roles of Chairman of the Board (a non-executive position) and Chief Executive Officer shouldremainseparatetoenabletheBoardtoprovideeffectiveguidancetomanagementandpromoteoversightand accountability of management. This separation preserves the distinction between the management and oversight functions,maintainingtheresponsibilityofmanagementtohelpdevelopcorporatestrategyandtheresponsibilityof the Board to review and provide input on corporate strategy.
To fulfill the role, the Chairman of the Board, among other things, creates and maintains an effective working relationship between the Board and the Company’s management; provides the CEO with on-going direction as to current Board needs, interests, views and expectations; and directs the Board agenda to the matters of greatest importance to Innospec.
|
| 9 |
The duties of the non-executive Chairman of the Boardinclude:
▶presiding over meetings of theBoard;
▶preparing the agenda for Board meetings in consultation with the CEO, CFO and other members of the Board;
▶calling and presiding over meetings of the independent Directors;
▶co-ordinating periodic review of management’s strategic plan for the Company;
▶after consulting with other Board members and the CEO, making recommendations tothe Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee as to the membership of variousBoardcommittees and CommitteeChairs;
▶managing the Board’s process for Director self-assessment and evaluation of the Board;
▶presiding over meetings ofstockholders;
▶encouraging active participation by each member of the Board;and
▶performing such other duties and services as the Board may require.
TheBoard’sRoleinRiskManagement
TheBoard’sroleinriskoversightandmanagementisconsistentwithourleadershipstructure,withtheCEOandother membersofseniormanagementhavingresponsibilityforassessingandmanagingtheCompany’sriskexposure,and the Board and its committees providing oversight in connection with these efforts. Risk management is an integral part of Board and committee deliberations throughout the year. During 2025, the Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Investor Relations, presented a summary of key risks facing the Company so the Board could discuss and assess such risks and the management of them on a timely and on-going basis.
The Global IT Director presents his information technology and cyber security update to the Board in person at
least annually.
Infiscal2025,eachofourDirectorscompletedourCodeofBusinessEthicsonlinecompliancetrainingprogramthat we require our employees to complete. In addition, in fiscal 2025, as part of our risk oversight of our information technologysystemsandriskmitigationefforts,employeetrainingoncybersecurityriskswasrequiredofallInnospec Directors and employees who have access to our information technology resources.
NCCGroup(“NCC”)performsperiodiccybersecurityreviews.NCCreportsitsfindingsdirectlytotheBoard.
|
| 10 |
Risk oversight – Who is responsible?
•monitors and evaluates how management operates the Company;
•considers updates received from management regarding quarterly performance;
•works with management on the corporate strategy;
•discusses risks related to the Company’s business strategy at periodic strategic planning meetings and at other meetings as appropriate;
•oversees risks related to environmental, social and governance matters;
•reviews quarterly assessment of the primary operational and regulatory risks facing the Company, their relative magnitude and management’s plan for mitigating and responding to these risks, including cyber security risk as needed; and
•reviews insurance coverage to assess whether it is adequate.
The Board
•considers the adequacy of steps taken by management to monitor and control the Company’s major financial risk exposures;
•is responsible for reviewing the Company’s policies and practices with respect to financial risk assessment and the integrity of the accounting policies, financial reporting and disclosure practices of Innospec; and
•oversees the performance of the Company’s systems of internal accounting and financial control.
The Audit Committee
|
| 11 |
•provides oversight to review compensation risk and to assess that all of the Company’s executive compensation and incentive programs are competitive, closely related to the achievement of corporate objectives and aligned with long-term interests of the stockholders.
The Compensation Committee
•oversees the development of and recommends to the Board a framework of corporate governance policies and procedures and a robust compliance program;
•takes a leadership role in shaping and communicating matters of corporate governance and business ethics to the Board and the Company;
•monitors and periodically reports to the Board on the compliance status across the Innospec Group
•monitors and discusses the work of the Executive Team ESG Steering Group and reports matters to the full Board which has oversight for environmental, social and governance risk; and
•nominates new directors and considers diversity, skills required for the Board to meet its obligations and various other stakeholder expectations.
The Nominating, Corporate Governance
and Sustainability Committee
|
| 12 |
DirectorIndependence
The Board, after considering all relevant facts and circumstances of which it is aware, including those matters set outbelowunder“FamilyRelationships”and“RelatedPersonTransactionsandRelationships”,hasdeterminedthat all of its non-employee members are independent, within the meaning of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2) applicable on the date of this Proxy Statement.
WehavealsoadoptedourownstandardsfordirectorindependencethatcanbefoundinourDirectorIndependence Policy on our website at www.innospec.com/about-us/corporate-governance.
|
The Board has determined that each member of the Board, who served during 2025 and/or who currently serves, except for Mr. Williams,meetstheindependencestandardsdescribedabove. Mr. Williams is not treated as independent because, as President and CEO, he is an employee of Innospec. In addition, as part of the independence determination, the Board monitors the independence ofAuditandCompensationCommitteemembersunderrulesofthe SECandNasdaqlistingstandardsthatareapplicabletomembersof the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. |
ALL OF OUR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS ARE INDEPENDENT |
Highly Independent Board:
6 out of 7 Board Members are Independent
FamilyRelationships
NoimmediatefamilyrelationshipexistsbetweenanyofourDirectorsorExecutiveOfficersandanyotherDirectors or Executive Officers.
TransactionsandRelationships
OtherthanthedirectorandexecutivecompensationarrangementsdiscussedinthisProxyStatement,therehavebeennotransactionssinceJanuary1,2025,towhichwehavebeenorwillbeaparticipant, inwhichtheamountinvolvedexceededorwillexceed$120,000,andinwhichanyofourdirectors,executiveofficersor holdersofmorethan5%ofanyclassofourvotingstock,oranymemberoftheimmediatefamilyof,orpersonsharing thehouseholdwith,anyoftheseindividuals,hadorwillhaveadirectorindirectmaterialinterest.
|
| 13 |
Related Person TransactionsApproval Policy
PursuanttoourCodeofConduct,allseniorofficersmustdisclosetotheBoardanymaterialtransactionorrelationship that could reasonably be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest. The Code of Conduct also states that no employeemayseektoobtainspecialtreatmentfromInnospecforfamilymembers,friendsorforbusinessesinwhich familymembersorfriendshaveaninterest.DuringtheyearendedDecember31,2025,theCompanydidnotmake any charitable contributions to any charity on which any Director serves as an executive officer.
ExecutiveSessionsofIndependentNon-EmployeeDirectors
Executivesessionsofindependentnon-employeeDirectorsareledbytheChairman.Anexecutivesessionisheldin conjunction with each regularly scheduled Board meeting and other sessions may be called by the Chairman at his discretion or at the request of the Board. There were four executive sessions of independent non-employee Directors during fiscal year 2025.
The Board will continue to monitor the standards for director independence established under applicable law or Nasdaq listing requirements and will maintain the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines to be consistent with those standards.
IdentifyingandEvaluatingNomineesforDirector
TheNominating,CorporateGovernanceandSustainabilityCommitteeusesavarietyofmethodsforidentifyingand evaluating nominees for Director. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee considers eachperson’sjudgment,experience,independence,understandingofourbusinessorotherrelatedindustries and such factors as the committee determines relevant in light of the needs of the Board and the Company. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee reviews the skills and attributes of Board members withinthecontextofthecurrentmake-upofthefullBoardandregularlyassessestheappropriatesizeoftheBoard and whether vacancies on the Board are expected due to retirement or otherwise.
In the event that vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee considers potential candidates for Director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating,CorporateGovernanceandSustainabilityCommitteethroughcurrentBoardmembers,stockholdersor other persons. The Board considers diversity in the nominatingprocess,alongwithothercriteria,forpotentialDirectorcandidatesandspecificallyrequeststhatfemales andminoritycandidatesareincludedineveryDirectorsearchpool.TherecruitmentspecificationfornewDirectors concentratesoncandidateswhoareseasonedexecutiveofficers,withsignificantrelevantexperience,bothatboard level and within relevant industries.
TheDirectorcandidatesareevaluatedatregularorspecialmeetingsoftheNominating,CorporateGovernanceand SustainabilityCommitteeandmaybeconsideredatanytimeduringtheyear.Thenomineesforelectionatthisyear’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders were approved for nomination by the Board upon the recommendation of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee.
|
| 14 |
OurDirectorrecruitmentprocessisasfollows:
|
Board and Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee determine desired criteria and experience of Director candidates. |
|
|
Director candidates identified by independent search firm, Board members, officers, employees or stockholders. |
|
|
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee evaluates Director candidates against selection criteria, individual characteristics, skills, diversity and qualifications and checks for possible conflicts and independence. |
|
|
Director candidates are interviewed by members of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee, Chairman of the Board and may also meet with the CEO and CFO. |
|
|
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee recommends suitable Director candidates to the Board. |
|
|
Board votes to appoint Director candidates based on an assessment of their qualifications and potential contributions to the Board. |
|
|
Stockholders vote on the election of the Director nominees at the |
ThepolicyoftheNominating,CorporateGovernanceandSustainabilityCommitteeistoconsiderproperlysubmitted stockholder nominations for election to the Board. For any candidate to be considered by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee, and if nominated, included in the Proxy Statement, such recommendation should be received no later than the deadline for submission of stockholder proposals. See “Stockholders’ Proposals for the 2027 Annual Meeting of Stockholders”. Recommendations should be sent to the Corporate Secretary and should specify the nominee’s name, qualification for Board membership and any other information required by the Company’s Bylaws. All properly submitted stockholder nominations for Director candidates receivedbytheCorporateSecretarywillbesubmittedtotheNominating,CorporateGovernanceandSustainability Committeeforreviewandconsideration.TheNominating,CorporateGovernanceandSustainabilityCommitteewill consider stockholder recommendations for Director candidates, but the Nominating, Corporate Governance and SustainabilityCommitteehasnoobligationtorecommendsuchcandidates.Assumingappropriatebiographicaland backgroundinformation(includingqualifications)isprovidedforDirectorcandidatesrecommendedbystockholders, theNominating,CorporateGovernanceandSustainabilityCommitteewillusethesameprocesstoevaluateDirector nomineesrecommendedbystockholdersasitdoestoevaluatenomineesidentifiedbyothersources.
|
| 15 |
DirectorOn-BoardingandContinuingEducation
Overview:
The Board and management conduct orientation for new Directors to become familiar with, amongst other things, Innospec’s business operations, strategies, financial matters, ethics, fiduciary duties, corporate governance and all other Company policies. It is the responsibility of management and the Nominating, Corporate Governance and SustainabilityCommitteetoadviseDirectorsaboutcontinuingeducationopportunities,whichtheyareencouraged to pursue. The Legal and Compliance Department provides training to the Board at least annually and the Chief ComplianceOfficerregularlyupdatestheNominating,CorporateGovernanceandSustainabilityCommitteeandfull Board on evolving law and practices and stockholder expectations.
Orientation:
When new Directors join the Board, they participate in a comprehensive on-boarding program to learn about our industry, business, strategies, and policies. Our on-boarding program includes provision of reading material regarding director duties and responsibilities, meetings with division heads and senior executives to discuss our businesses, strategy,operationsandourcorporatefunctionssuchasfinance,informationtechnology,researchanddevelopment, and legal and compliance. New Directors also meet with the executives and staff supporting the Committees on whichtheysitandareprovidedwithinformationandtrainingspecifictotheBoardCommittee(s)theyareappointed to.Inaddition,everyDirectormustcompleteinductiontrainingoncompliancewithintwoweeksofbeingappointed and a more in-depth training once they have been in office for six months.
Continuingeducation:
Forcontinuededucationregardingourbusinessandindustry,atleastannually,weprovidepresentationsbyinternal and external experts during our regular Board meetings on topics such as, industry trends, risks facing the industry and the Company, corporate governance trends and key topics, and stakeholder expectations with particular focus ontheimplicationsandimpactontheCompany.In2025,theBoardreceivedtraining, or updates,onD&O,PropertyandCasualty insurance and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) issues.
MeetingsandAttendance
In 2025, the full Board met four times, the Audit Committee met four times, the Compensation Committee met four times, and the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee met four times. There were four Non-Employee Director meetings at which no members of management were present. Directors are expected to attend all Board Meetings and meetings of Committees on which they serve. During the year ended December 31, 2025, each of the Directors attended, in person, by telephone or video call, all the meetings of the Board and meetings of Committees of the Board on which he or she served that were held while he or she was a member. Directors are also expected to attend all meetings of stockholders. All of the Directors attended the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
|
| 16 |
LimitationonOtherBoardandAuditCommitteePositions
The Board has adopted restrictions on the number of outside boards on which Directors may serve that are consistent with market standards and regulatory requirements, including limits on executive officers of publicly-tradedcompanies.SothatDirectorsareabletodedicatesufficienttimetoInnospec’sBoard,theBoardestablished the following limits on our Directors serving on publicly-traded company boards and audit committees:
|
Director Category |
Limit on publicly-traded company board and audit committee service, including Innospec |
|
Non-employee directors who are not full-time employees of a publicly-traded company |
4 public company boards maximum |
|
Board members who are full-time employees of a publicly-traded company |
2 public company boards maximum |
|
Non-employee directors who serve on Innospec’s Audit Committee |
3 audit committees’ maximum |
Any Board member wishing to join the board of another publicly-traded company is required to first notify the Chair of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee, the Chairman of the Board, and Innospec’s General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer prior to joining such other board or agreeing to be nominated or serve on a director slate at such other board. The Chair of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee and General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer will review the proposed board membership to confirm compliance with applicable laws and policies. Potential conflicts of interest, if any, will be referred to the Chairman of the Board for review.
Throughout the year, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee monitors the service of our Directors on boards and board committees of other companies, to assess the potential impact of holding multiple positions on the individual Director’s ability to devote sufficient time and attention to his or her duties as a Director of Innospec.
CodeofConduct
The Board has adopted a Code of Conduct, violations of which may be reported to the Chair of the Nominating, CorporateGovernanceandSustainabilityCommitteeortheCorporateSecretary.ThisCodeofConductisintendedto promote,amongotherthings,honestandethicalconduct,fullandaccuratereportingandcompliancewithapplicable laws and regulations. A copy of the Code of Conduct is available on our website under “Corporate Governance” at: www.innospec.com/about-us/corporate-governance.
SupplierCodeofConduct
Innospecbelievesthathonestandtransparentbusinessconductisvitalandiscommittedtoethicalbusinesspractices and actively enforcing compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and rules. We have therefore adopted a Supplier Code of Conduct, pursuant to which our suppliers are required to comply with all applicable laws, rules andregulations,includingthoserelatedtobusinessintegrity,humanrightsandsafety,healthandtheenvironment. Innospec engages EcoVadis to conduct corporate social responsibility risk assessments of key suppliers and those operatingoutofhigh-risklocations.Amongotherthings,EcoVadisassessmentsallowustoevaluatesupplierpolicies andactionstakenbythesupplierandtoidentifyfurtheractionsrequiredtoenforcecompliancewithinternationally recognized human rights standards and fair labor practices.
We also have an internal protocol to support our review of, and response to, concerns raised regarding our supply chain.Innospecmayinvokesanctionsagainstsuppliers,uptoandincludingterminationofthebusinessrelationship, if they violate modern slavery laws.
AcopyoftheSupplierCodeofConductisavailableonourwebsiteunder“SupplierRelations”at:
https://innospec.com/about-us/supplier-relations/.
|
| 17 |
RaisingIssuesandReportingViolations
Innospec’s employees, customers, suppliers and other stakeholders play a critical role in establishing, promoting and upholding a culture of compliance. An integral part of that culture is the creation of an environment in which concerns regarding unlawful, fraudulent or unethical matters may be raised without fear of retaliation. Innospec’s employees, customers, suppliers and other stakeholders may report concerns via several mechanisms which are outlined in our Reporting Corporate Governance Concerns Policy (for employees) and Third-Party Notice (for customers, suppliers and other stakeholders) and include a whistleblowing hotline, EthicsPoint. A copy of our Reporting Corporate Governance Concerns Third-Party Notice can be found on our website under “Corporate Governance” at: www.innospec.com/about-us/corporate-governance.
NoRetaliationonReportingIssuesorViolations
OurReportingCorporateGovernanceConcernsPolicystatesthatInnospecwillnotretaliateagainstanypersonwho acts in good faith to report Concerns or helps to investigate or resolve Concerns, including individuals who make reports, conduct investigations, are interviewed as witnesses or provide evidence. Innospec will not tolerate any form of retaliation against any person who reports or helps to investigate or resolve Concerns. Any employee who displaysretaliatorybehaviorsmaybesubjecttodisciplinaryaction,uptoandincludingterminationofemployment. Any customer, supplier or other stakeholder who displays these behaviors may have their contract or relationship with Innospec terminated.
StockTradingPolicy
WehaveadoptedaStock Trading Policythatprovidesrestrictionson,andguidelinesfor,tradingCompanysecurities, or the securities of any other company while in possession of material non-public information. The Stock Trading Policyappliestoallofourofficers,directors,employees,contractorsandagents.WebelievetheStockTradingPolicy isreasonablydesignedtopromotecompliancewithinsidertradinglaws,rulesandregulations,andapplicablelisting standards.Inaddition,itisthepolicyoftheCompanytocomplywithallapplicablesecuritieslawsandregulations.A copy of our Stock Trading Policy is filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Anti-HedgingPolicy
Our Stock Trading Policy contains an anti-hedging provision that prohibits directors, officers and employees from hedging any stock, share or other securities issued by Innospec (including through the use of financial instruments, such as prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) or otherwise engage in transactionsthathedgeoroffset,oraredesignedtohedgeoroffset,anydecreaseinthemarketvalueofanystock, share or other securities issued by the Company.
Anti-Pledging Policy
OurStockTradingPolicycontainsaprovisionthatprohibitsdirectors,officersandemployeesfromholdinganystock, share or other securities issued by the Company in a margin account, or from otherwise pledging such securities as collateralforaloan,unlessthepersonobtainsapprovalinadvancefromtheNominating,CorporateGovernanceand SustainabilityCommittee.Noapprovalwillbegrantedunlessthatpersonclearlydemonstratesthefinancialcapacity to repay the loan (which must not constitute margin debt) without resorting to the pledged securities (pledges arising from certain types of hedging transactions are governed by the anti-hedging policy described above).
|
| 18 |
CopiesofCodeofConduct,CorporateGovernanceGuidelinesandCommitteeCharters
Copies of our Code of Conduct, Corporate Governance Guidelines and each of the Board Committee charters can be accessed via the Company’s website under “Corporate Governance” at: https://innospec.com/about-us/corporate-governance. The Company intends to disclose on this section of its website any amendments to, or waivers from, its Code of Conduct that are required to be publicly disclosed pursuant to the rules of the SEC or Nasdaq.
CommunicationswithOurBoard
Any stockholder and other interested person who may desire to contact the Chairman or any of the Directors of Innospec may do so via the following e-mail address: [email protected], or by writing to them at InnospecInc.,8310SouthValleyHighway,Suite350,Englewood,CO80112.TheCorporateSecretarywill review communications received electronically and forward them to the addressee of the communication.TheCorporateSecretarywillreviewthecommunicationsreceivedbymailorcourierandforwardto the appropriate addressee.
BoardCommittees
TheBoardmaintainsthefollowingcommitteestoassistitindischargingitsoversightresponsibilities.TheBoardhas determinedthateachmemberofthefollowingcommitteesisanindependentdirector.Thecurrentmembershipof each committee is:
|
Board Member |
Audit Committee |
Compensation Committee |
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee |
||
|
Ms. Elizabeth K. Arnold |
|
Member |
|
Member |
|
|
Mr. Milton C. Blackmore |
Member |
Member |
|
||
|
Mr. David F. Landless |
|
Chair |
|
Member |
|
|
Mr. Lawrence J. Padfield |
|
Chair |
|
||
|
Mr. Leslie J. Parrette |
|
Member |
Member |
||
|
Ms. Claudia P. Poccia |
|
Member |
Chair |
||
|
Number of meetings in 2025: |
4 |
4 |
4 |
||
|
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
|
| 19 |
|
Audit Current Members**: David F. Landless (Chair) Since: Member since January 2016, Chair Milton C. Blackmore Elizabeth K. Arnold Independence: |
Key Responsibilities: •monitoringandoverseeingtheCompany’sinternalcontrolsandfinancialreportingprocess •overseeing the independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements by theCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm •assistingtheBoardwithitsoversightoflegalandregulatorycompliancerequirementsinrespectof financial reporting •overseeingthedeterminationoftheindependentauditor’squalificationsandindependence •overseeing the performance of the Company’s Business Assurance function, including internalaudit and of the independent auditors •preparing an audit committee report as required by the SEC to be included in our annual proxystatement;and •meeting with the CFO, the Head of Business Assurance and the independent registered publicaccounting firm at least twice annually. •Our independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to the Audit Committee, asdoes our Business Assurance group. •The Audit Committee meets with management and our independent registered public accountingfirmpriortothefilingofthecertificationsoftheCEOandCFOwiththeSECtoreceiveinformationconcerning,amongotherthings,significantdeficienciesormaterialweaknessesinthedesignor operationofinternalcontrols. •Audit Committee Financial Experts. Our Board has determined that each of Mr. Landless andMs. Arnold qualify as an “Audit Committee Financial Expert”* as such term is defined in SECrules,andmeetthestandardforfinancialknowledgeandsophisticationrequiredbyNasdaqandthatothermembersoftheAuditCommitteealsopossesstherequiredleveloffinancialliteracyand are independent for the purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the“Exchange Act”) and Nasdaq rules. •We limit the number of Audit Committees of publicly traded companies on which our AuditCommittee members may serve to three or less, including the Company. •TheAuditCommitteeReportappearslaterinthisProxy Statement. •The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written Audit Committee Charter which sets outitsmainobligations.AcurrentcopyoftheAuditCommitteeCharterisavailableonourwebsiteunder “Corporate Governance” at: www.innospec.com/about-us/corporate-governance. |
*InthecaseofMr.Landless,theBoardmadethisdeterminationbasedonMr.Landless’squalificationasacharteredmanagementaccountantandhispreviousexperienceasGroupFinanceDirectorofBodycoteplc.andbeforethat,FinanceDirectorofCourtauldsCoatings(Holdings)Limited.HealsohaddirectexperienceasChairandmemberoftheAuditCommitteeofLuxferHoldingsplc.aswellasAuditCommitteeChairof Renold plc.
InthecaseofMs.Arnold,theBoardmadethisdeterminationbasedonMs.Arnold’squalificationsandpreviousexperienceasChiefFinancialOfficer of Houghton International, Chief Financial Officer of Physiotherapy Associates and Chief Financial Officer of Tyco Flow Control andbefore that Chief Financial Officer of GE Silicones General Electric. Ms. Arnold also has experience as Audit Committee Chair at FreightCarAmericaInc.
**TheAuditCommitteecomprisedatleastthreemembersatalltimesduring2025,asrequiredbyourAuditCommittee Charter.
|
| 20 |
|
Compensation Current Members: Lawrence J.Padfield (Chair) Since: Member since December 2012, Chair Milton C. Blackmore Claudia P. Poccia: Leslie J. Parrette: Independence: |
Key Responsibilities: •reviewsmanagementcompensationprograms •recommendscompensationtermsandagreementsforseniorExecutiveOfficerstotheBoardforBoardapproval •reviewschangesincompensationforseniorExecutiveOfficersandNon-EmployeeDirectors(“NEDs”) •overseestheCompany’sstock-basedplans •reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to Chief Executive Officercompensation and evaluates the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of those goals •reviewsandmakesrecommendationstotheBoardonanannualbasisregardingtheevaluationprocess and compensation structure for the Company’s Officers •reviewsandmakesrecommendationstotheBoardregardingbenefitplanswhichpertaintothesenior Executive Officers who report to the Chief Executive Officer •reviews the Company’s incentive compensation and stock-based plans and recommends changesin such plans to the Board as needed; and •provides the Compensation Committee Report as required by the SEC and included in theCompany’s proxy statement. •CompensationCommitteeInterlocksandInsiderParticipation:During2025,noCompensationCommittee members were officers or employees of the Company, were former officers of theCompany or were engaged in transactions with a related person that would be required to bedisclosed by relevant SEC rules. •During 2025 none of the Company’s Executive Officers served as directors or board committeemembersofanotherentitywhereanyexecutiveofficersofsuchotherentityservedasaDirectorof the Company or as a member of any of the Company’s Board Committees. •The Compensation Committee Report appears later in this Proxy Statement. •The Compensation Committee operates under a written Compensation Committee Charterthat governs its duties and standards of performance. A current copy of the CompensationCommittee Charter is available on our website under “Corporate Governance” at:www.innospec.com/about-us/corporate-governance. |
|
| 21 |
|
Nominating, Current Members: Claudia P. Poccia (Chair) Since: Member since July 2019, Chair since May 2020 David F. Landless Leslie J. Parrette: Elizabeth K. Arnold Independence: |
Key Responsibilities: •identifyindividualsqualifiedtobecomeBoardmembersconsistentwithcriteriaapprovedbytheBoard •recommendtotheBoardthepersonstobenominatedbytheBoardforelectionasDirectorsatthe Annual Meeting •developandrecommendtotheBoardasetofcorporategovernanceandcomplianceprinciples •oversee the self-evaluation of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and SustainabilityCommittee, the self-evaluation of the Board and management’s evaluation of the Board •monitor the Company’s continued compliance with Company policies and applicable rules andregulations by reviewing reports from the Legal Compliance Department that cover training,results of audits and policy updates •monitortheworkoftheLegalComplianceDepartmentinestablishingobservanceofInnospec’sgovernance principles; and •help shape the corporate governance policy of the Company by promoting legal compliance bytheCompany. •ActastheBoard’sconduitinenvironmentalandsocialmattersbyinterfacingwiththeExecutiveTeamESGSteeringGroupregardingcommunicationandreportingplansandriskandotherwisehelping the Board in its promotion of environmental and social factors and the satisfaction ofassociatedobligations. •The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee operates under awritten Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee Charter thatgovernsitsdutiesandstandardsofperformance.AcurrentcopyoftheNominating,CorporateGovernance and Sustainability Committee Charter is available on our website under “CorporateGovernance”:https://innospec.com/about-us/corporate-governance/. |
|
| 22 |
BoardandCommitteeSelf-Evaluations
Eachyear,theNominating,CorporateGovernanceandSustainabilityCommitteeoverseestheBoard,Committeeand Director self-evaluation process.
Theannualevaluationprocessisasfollows:
StockholderEngagement
In 2025 Innospec participated in five investor conferences and two non-deal-roadshows. This included multiple engagementswiththemajorityofourlargestactivestockholders,representingintheaggregatemorethanone-third of our outstanding stock, during the year. Where beneficial, we continued to leverage virtual meeting tools.
TheCompanywasrepresentedbyaminimumoftwo,andoftenthreeoftheseniorexecutivescomprisingtheCEO,CFO andSeniorVicePresident,CorporateDevelopmentandInvestorRelations.Duringtheyear,severalupdatedversions ofourinvestorpresentationwereproducedcoveringbusinessperformance,strategyandfinancialmanagementof the Company. Concurrent with each update, the presentation was uploaded to the Company’s website so that all investors had access to the same information.
The Company’s senior management team also engaged with investors and analysts in the period soon after the release of quarterly results to discuss those quarterly results.
Along with business performance, market conditions, capital allocation plans and strategy, other issues were discussed as raised by investors.
|
| 23 |
SUSTAINABILITY
OurStrategicApproachtoSustainability
Asaglobalspecialtychemicalcompany,Innospecunderstandsthatthewayweconductourbusinessisessentialto the long-term success of Innospec. Our sustainability strategy is broken down into three key areas:Environmental, Social and Governance. We focus our actions in areas where we can have the most impact on the long-term future ofourbusiness.Webelievethisapproachreflectsourstakeholders’prioritiesanddemonstratesourcommitmentto striving to grow our business in what we believe to be a sustainable and socially responsible manner.
|
Environmental |
|
Social |
|
Governance |
|
|
Environmental impact Measuring and reducing the impact our activities have on the environment. Product sustainability Supplying safe, sustainable products, designed to meet the needs of society now and in the future, to help customers achieve their sustainability goals. |
Health, safety and well-being We strive to be leaders in health and safety, safeguarding anyone that could be affected by our activities and operations. Employees Investing in the growth, diversity and development of our employees helps us to attract talent and achieve long-term success. Community engagement Supporting local communities through education, fundraising and sponsorship opportunities |
Legal compliance Understanding that honest, ethical and transparent conduct is vital to our success and reputation. Implementation of robust operating systems and processes that protect the security of the company and its employees, information and intellectual property. Third-partymanagement Verifying our supply chain complies with legal, ethical and social requirements, while also finding opportunities for environmental improvement and economic efficiency. |
|||
|
These are all built on the solid foundation of our economic commitment to responsible growth. |
|||||
|
| 24 |
SustainabilityGovernance
Innospec’s sustainability governance structure features standalone sustainability teams for each of our businesses reportingintoanExecutiveSustainabilitySteeringGroup.TheExecutiveSustainabilitySteeringGroupcomprisesour CEO and senior business leaders and is responsible for developing, resourcing and making decisions on Innospec’s sustainability strategy, targets and objectives. This group meets and reports, on a quarterly basis, directly to our Board’s Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee who have oversight of sustainability strategy,objectivesandprogress.Inadditiontothis,thefullBoardisbriefedannuallyonoursustainabilityprogress, strategy, and future direction. Our VP Global Regulatory Compliance and Sustainability is responsible for leading Innospec’ssustainabilitystrategy,implementationandcontinuedexecution.Ourdedicatedsustainabilityteamsfor our three business units focus on specific issues relevant to their customers and markets.

|
| 25 |
SustainabilityPerformanceHighlightsfromour2024SustainabilityReport
|
Environment |
Governance |
|
•Reducing our impact on the environment -22% reduction in absolute scope 1&2 GHG emissions since 2014* -25% reduction in water intensity usage since 2014* *Baseline reporting year •Completion of energy reduction projects across our global operations in 2024 that will reduce our energy consumption by 2,289 MWh and scope 1 & 2 emissions by 367 metric tonnes each year •All our manufacturing facilities now source 100% renewable electricity •Renewable energy accounts for 19% of Innospec’s energy mix •Verified performance •CDP Supply Chain Disclosure Program 2024 •Climate – Performance band score of B (management) •Water Security – Performance band score of B (management) •EcoVadis Supply Chain CSR Assessment–Gold medal ranking status |
•Quarterly board committee and executive team oversightmeetings of environmental, social and governance issues •9,172 compliance courses delivered to all employees and directors as part of our annual compliance training and certification program. •Sustainable Supply Chain •EcoVadis assessment incorporated into our supplier evaluation and approval process. Innospec’s supply chain continues to score better than the EcoVadis Average. •Sustainable sourcing of palm program •Membership of Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) since 2013 and RSPO mass balance supply chain certified at all applicable manufacturing sites •Increased transparency of our palm- based supply chain through our annual transparency and risk mapping assessment •Member of the Action for Sustainable Derivatives (ASD), a new collaborative initiative that is working to maximize sustainability throughout the palm supply chain •Palm Grievance Procedure and tracking system •Risk Oversight •As part of oversight of our cyber security and information technology systems, employee training on cyber security risks was required of all Innospec Directors and employees who have access to our information technology resources •For each of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2023 and 2025 the Board retained NCC Group (“NCC”) to perform cyber security reviews against NIST CSF Framework. NCC reports its findings directly to the Board. Going forward the company is working towards attaining ISO27001. |
|
| 26 |
|
Health, Safety & Wellbeing |
Community Engagement |
|
•Active near miss incident reporting program (defined as a learning event that did not cause harm but had the potential to cause injury or loss), with 13,633 near misses raised in 2024, up 2% on 2023 •Innospec 2024 Employee Reportable Lost Time Accident Frequency Rate of 0.32 per 100,000 hours. •Process safety systems, procedures and leadership targeting the prevention of major accident hazard events •Corporate behavioral safety program Journey to Zero Harm rolled out to all employees globally •Wellbeing support, training and advice offered to employees |
•Over $791,000 social value in 2024 supporting 210 charities and good causes •Innospec Cares, our global charitable program that enables employees to support their chosen charitable organizations through financial giving and volunteering days •1,558 employee volunteering hours worked for good causes •Over $2.3 million raised for the PenFed Foundation Military Heroes Fund since 2007 •Supporting the next generation of scientists and engineers through engagement with schools and educational centers |
|
Sustainable Innovation |
|
•$47.8millioninvestmentinproductdevelopmentandapplicationup15%on 2023 •354peopleworkinggloballyinResearch&TechnologyandTechnicalSupport •Provisionofsafe,sustainableproductsdesignedtomeettheneedsofsociety,whileminimizingtheirenvironmental impact in manufacture and use |
|
| 27 |
WorkingtowardstheUNSustainableDevelopmentGoals
Innospec recognizes that the private sector plays an important role in advancing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (“SDGs”) which address the world’s most pressing economic, social and environmental challenges. In 2024, we conducted a review of our activities, mapping them against the SDGs and found that we directly contribute to 14 of the goals. Of these we have identified five that align most closely to our operations; QualityEducation,AffordableandCleanEnergy,DecentWorkandEconomicGrowth,ResponsibleConsumptionand Production,andLifeonLand.TheUNSDGshavebeenusedtoguideourmaterialityassessmentandtheevolutionof ourSustainabilitystrategyandagenda.Wewillcontinuetoevolveourexistingsustainabilityinitiativestomaximize our contribution.
|
SDGs we contribute the most towards |
Other SDGs we contribute towards |
|
|
CorporateSocialResponsibilityReporting
As part of Innospec’s ongoing commitment to being open and transparent around our performance, our latest2024SustainabilityReportwasindependentlyassessedtoamoderatelevelofassurance,tothegloballyrecognized AccountAbility’s AA1000 Assurance Standard 2018.
The 2024 Sustainability Report, along with further information on our Sustainability program and performance, is available at https://innospecsustainability.com, but does not constitute part of, and is not incorporated by reference into, this Proxy Statement.
|
| 28 |
HUMANCAPITALMANAGEMENT
|
We work hard to make the company an attractive career choice for both new recruits and existing employees. |
Human capital management is critical to Innospec’s ongoing business success.Our aim is to create an engaged and motivated workforce where employees are inspired by leadership, engaged in purpose-driven, meaningful work and have opportunities for growth and development. An effective approach to human capital management requires that we invest in talent, development, culture, and employee engagement. We aim to create an environmentwhereouremployeesareencouragedtomakepositivecontributions and fulfill their potential. |
CoreValues&Culture
Ourcorevaluesare:
Responsible Growth:Financial stability and growth are essential to maintain our goal of making a positive contributiontowardsamoresustainablefuture.Generatingeconomicbenefitsforouremployees,stockholders,and localcommunities—encouragingongoinginnovationinourproductportfolioalongsideexcellentcustomerservice, financial stability and responsible growth, will allow our business to be competitive and sustainable.
CaringforPeople:Westrivetocreateasafeandcaringculturewhereouremployeesaresupportedandencouraged to make positive contributions. Our continued success depends on keeping people safe, promoting a healthy lifestyle, protecting human rights, improving education, training and maintaining good relations with our neighbors.
Conserving&ProtectingtheEnvironment:Weaimtouseresourcesasefficientlyaspracticableandminimizingthe impact of our operations on the environment. We look to supply safe, sustainable products, designed to meet the needs of society now and in the future while minimizing their environmental impact.
Leading by Example:We understand that honest, ethical and transparent conduct is vital to our success and reputation.Everyemployeeplaysanessentialpartincomplyingwithlocalandnationallaws,rulesandregulations. We uphold a high standard of corporate and business integrity across all of our activities.
AtInnospec,weencourageourpeopletoaspiretoaculturethatis:
Confident
Weknowwhatisexpectedofusandtakeresponsibilityforourownworkload.Weassumeresponsibilityformaking decisionsandareflexibleinourdealingswithpeople.Wetakeadditionalresponsibilitytomeetcustomerneedsand enhance performance.
Informed
We take pride in being good at what we do and actively seek to enhance our knowledge and skills to help improve performance. We use our expertise co-operatively to meet customer needs and enhance our performance. We respect each other and listen carefully to understand others’ points of view.
Clear
As an organization, we are open and transparent. We encourage and welcome feedback and we support people to deal with any unwelcome messages.
|
| 29 |
Innovative
Our people are forward thinking and inspired. We enjoy challenges and encourage new ideas. We seek continual improvement, and care about treating people well through periods of change.
Dynamic
We are performance driven, enthusiastic and quick to respond. We set clear targets and objectives and take satisfactioninachievingthem.Wewanttobepartofasuccessfulteamandbusiness,andwemakedecisionsquickly and implement them.
EmployeeEngagement
AttractingTalent.Webelieveourhardworkingteamofemployeesisourgreatestasset.Weemployapproximately 2,469 people across 23 countries, and we believe that the skills, commitment and enthusiasm of our employees helps us to deliver long-term growth for investors.
|
Across our sites, we provide local support and opportunities for the next generationoftalentinourindustrybyofferingarangeofplacements,internships, work experience, and apprenticeships. We strive to attract and retain the best talent in a changing and competitive working environment. Pay and benefits. We offer what we believe are competitive reward and recognitionprograms,basedonbothbusiness-wideandindividualperformance. Our packages have been designed to attract and retain the best employees, rewardachievement,andencourageourteamstodeliversuperiorperformance for our customers and our company. |
We have a very high level of staff retention, with 33% and 54% of our employees serving greater than 10 years and 5 years, respectively. |
InadditiontoourCompanywideperformanceincentiveplans,weencourageouremployeestoshareinthelong-term successofourCompanywithincentiveprograms,suchasourGlobalSharesaveplan.Thisplangivesemployeesthe opportunitytoparticipateinasavingsplanlinkedtoanoptiontobuysharesinInnospecatadiscountand,therefore, benefitfromanygrowthinthesharepriceoverthesavingsperiod.Wealsoprovidearangeofotherbenefitsinline with the market practice in each location we operate in, including insurance and pension arrangements.
Performance Management Framework. We conduct an annual performance management process across the organization. Together with their line managers, employees agree upon annual objectives, and, at the end of the year, review with their line manager their performance against those objectives and their overall performance.The results of each annual performance review affect performance bonus amounts, pay, adjustment and career advancement decisions.
SeniorLeadershipCommunicationsandTransparency.Weactivelyseekopportunitiesforregularengagementand communication by our CEO and other Senior Executives with our broader employee population. Communications are through a variety of means including written communications, webcasts and conference calls. For example, we holdaCEOCallatleastonceayear,duringwhichtheCEOandCFOdiscusscurrentissuesanddevelopmentsin the business, including a Q&A session answering questions raised by employees. The CEO Call is accessible to all employeesacrosstheCompany.InadditiontotheCEOCalls,eachfinancialquarter,followingthequarterlyfinancial results announcement, the CEO and CFO provide a written review of the financial results to all employees.
DiversityandInclusion
Innospec aims to attract and retain the best people by making employment decisions that are based on merit, performance, ability, and contribution to the Company. As part of our Global HR Policies, our diversity and equal opportunities policy means that current and prospective employees receive equal opportunities irrespective of sex
|
| 30 |
orgender(includingpregnancy,childbirthandpregnancy-relatedconditions),genderidentityorexpression,genetic information,maritalstatus,sexualorientation,race,color,ethnicornationalorigin,age,disability,religion,creedor belief or any other characteristic protected by applicable local legislation.
Health and Safety
Objectives.Weprioritizethesafetyofemployees,communitiesandeveryoneinvolvedinthemanufacture,use or disposal of our products. We set high standards for process and occupational safety, which is managed by our network of Safety, Health and Environment (“SHE”) professionals throughout the business. SHE is a top priority for Innospec with our three core objectives being:
|
•No one gets hurt •We don’t negatively impact our neighbors •We leave only the gentlest footprints on our environment |
It is our goal to make sure that everybody returns home safe at the end of the working day. |
Leadership.The Company periodically reviews the Corporate SHE structure and organization so that we have the optimum resources and correct approach. We strive to embed SHE in our culture by having leadership that comes fromexecutivemanagement.OurResponsibleCareExecutiveCommittee(knownasRESPECT)comprisesmembers of the senior leadership team and is led by the CEO. RESPECT is responsible for setting the group’s SHE policiesand objectives across the global business. It also monitors ongoing performance in these areas throughout the year. Through this structure, we have established a strong culture of safety within our organization. The RESPECT committee reports to the Board and conducts a major review of objectives and performance annually alongside quarterly interim reviews.
Training.Training is an essential part of our health and safety strategy. To minimize the risk of accident or injury, we give our employees the information they need, delivered effectively and at the appropriate time. Our ongoing trainingprogramsdemonstrateourcommitmenttotargetingzeroaccidents,makingsurethatsafetyisalwaysfront of mind and that we continually raise standards.
Every year, employees across our sites take part in a variety of site-specific training courses to enable them to be competent and safe in their roles.
AcopyoftheCompany’sSafety,HealthandEnvironmentPolicycanbefoundonthe“Sustainability”sectionofthe Company’swebsiteathttps://innospecsustainability.com,butdoesnotconstitutepartof,andisnotincorporated by reference into, this Proxy Statement.
DevelopmentandTraining
Asanorganization,wearecommittedtomakingInnospecagreatcompanytoworkforandweinvest,asappropriate, in the development of our employees to meet this ambition.
Our employees are offered both internal and external training, where appropriate, to support their continued development and to meet the needs of our business. Where relevant, we support our employees’ ongoing professional training and development to encourage their progression within our business.
The Board is also actively involved in reviewing and approving executive compensation, selections and succession plans so that we have leadership in place with the requisite skills and experience to deliver results the right way. TheCEOperiodicallyprovidestheBoardwithanassessmentofeachSeniorExecutivethathasthepotentialtobea successorfortheCEOposition,aswellasperspectivesonpotentialcandidatesforotherseniormanagementpositions.
|
| 31 |
Further information on our human capital management initiatives is available in our annual Environmental, Social & Governance Report, available online in the “Sustainability” section of the Company’s website at https://innospecsustainability.com,butdoesnotconstitutepartof,andisnotincorporatedbyreferenceinto,this Proxy Statement.
|
| 32 |
PROPOSAL1–ELECTIONOFTWOCLASSIDIRECTORS
(Item1ontheProxyCard)
ThefirstproposaltobevotedonatthemeetingistheelectionoftwoClassIDirectors.Thedirectorselectedatthis meeting will serve until the 2029 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Board has nominated Elizabeth K. Arnold and Claudia P. Poccia,currentClassIDirectors,whosetermsexpireattheupcoming Annual Meeting of Stockholders, for election to the Board.
|
The Bylaws of the Company provide that the number of directors shall be not lessthanthreenormorethantwelvemembers,theexactnumberofwhichshall bedeterminedfromtimetotimebyresolutionadoptedbytheBoard,andthatthe Board shall be divided into three classes, designated Class I, Class II and Class III.Eachclassshallconsist,asnearlyasmaybepossible,ofone-thirdofthetotal number of Directors constituting the entire Board. |
|
The Board recommendsthat you vote “FOR” each Director nominee. |
Thebelowchartincludesthisyear’snomineesincludedinProposal1,alongwiththeirage,tenure,principal occupation and committee membership:
|
Age |
Independent |
Director Since |
Board Committee(s) |
Principal Occupation |
Other Public Board Position(s) |
|
|
Elizabeth K. Arnold |
61 |
✔ |
2020 |
Audit Committee Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee |
Retired |
FreightCar America Inc. – NED, Audit Committee Chair and member of Nominating and Governance and Compensation Committee |
|
Claudia P. Poccia |
66 |
✔ |
2019 |
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee (Chair), Compensation Committee |
CEO |
None |
Ifanomineebecomesunableorunwillingtoacceptnominationorelection,theBoardwilleitherselectasubstitute nominee or reduce the size of the Board. If you have submitted a proxy and a substitute nominee is selected, your shares will be voted for the election of the substitute nominee.
TheBoardhasnoreasontobelievethatanynomineewouldbeunableorunwillingtoserveif elected.
According to the Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee recommended to the Board that the Board submit the Class I Directors to the vote of stockholders. The above-named nominees will be elected to the Board on a plurality of the votes of the shares present or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote.
|
| 33 |
Our“MajorityVote”DirectorResignationPolicy
AccordingtotheproceduresetoutinourCorporateGovernanceGuidelines,inanuncontestedelection,anynominee for director (including an incumbent director) who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her electionthanvotes“for”suchelection,thenomineemustofferhisorherresignationpromptlytotheBoardfollowing certification of the stockholder vote. Upon receipt of the resignation, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and SustainabilityCommitteewillconsidertheresignationofferandrecommendtotheBoardwhethertoacceptit.The Board will act on the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee’s recommendation within 120 days following certification of the stockholder vote. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee and the Board may consider any factors they deem relevant in deciding whether to accept a director’s resignation. Thereafter, the Company will promptly disclose the Board’s decision whether to accept the director’s resignation offer (and the reasons for rejecting the resignation offer, if applicable) in a Current Report on Form 8-K furnished to the SEC. This resignation policy does not apply to contested director elections.
|
| 34 |
INFORMATIONABOUTTHEINNOSPECINC.BOARD
Innospec believes that having an independent, active, and engaged Board is key to our success. We also believe that new perspectives and ideas are critical to a forward-looking and strategic Board. Our goal is to seek a balance between new points of view and the valuable experience and knowledge that longer-serving directors bring to the boardroom.WebelievethatwehaveassembledaBoardwithvariedbackgrounds,experiencesandviewpointswho understand our markets, customers and employees. The Board seeks a mix of directors with qualities that result in a well-rounded, diverse Board that thinks critically and also functions effectively by reaching informed decisions. Our Directors have a diversity of experience and a variety of skills, education, qualifications and viewpoints that strengthen the Board’s ability to carry out its oversight role of the Company and effectively represent the interests of stockholders.
Current Board and Committee fast facts:
|
0 |
|
67 Years |
|
10 Years |
|
100% |
|
No Over-boarded Directors |
|
Average Director Age |
|
Average Director Tenure |
|
Independent Board Committee Members |
BoardSkillsMatrix
ThetablebelowisasummaryoftherangeofattributesandexperiencesthateachDirectorcurrentlyinofficebrings toourBoard.Asitisasummary,itisnotintendedtobeacompletedescriptionofalloftheskillsandattributesthat each of our Board members possesses.
Additionalinformationaboutthebackground,businessexperienceandothermattersofeachnomineeanddirector who will continue in office following the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, as well as a description of how each individual’s experience qualifies him or her to serve as a director of the Company is provided under the heading “Director Biographies” beginning on page 36.
|
| 35 |
|
Director Skill/Competency |
Ms.ElizabethK.Arnold |
Mr.MiltonC.Blackmore |
Mr.DavidF.Landless |
Mr.LawrenceJ.Padfield |
Mr.LeslieJ.Parrette |
Ms.ClaudiaP.Poccia |
Mr.PatrickS.Williams |
|
|
Senior Leadership Experience Business and strategic management experience from service in a significant leadership position, such as CEO, CFO or other senior executive role. |
• |
• |
• |
• |
• |
• |
• |
|
Financial Literacy Directors with an advanced understanding of finance and accounting provide oversight of the preparation of financial statements and risk management. |
• |
• |
• |
• |
|
|
|
|
Public Company Board Experience Experience serving on the boards of other public companies, which provides an understanding of corporate governance practices and the dynamics and operation of a corporate board, management accountability and protecting stockholder interests. |
• |
|
• |
|
|
• |
• |
|
Chemical Industry Experience In-depth knowledge of our industry, operations, and competitive environment. |
• |
• |
• |
• |
|
• |
• |
|
Corporate Governance Experience An understanding of corporate governance practices and the dynamics and operation of a corporate board, management accountability and protecting stockholder interests. |
• |
• |
• |
• |
• |
• |
• |
|
Manufacturing/Operations Experience Experience in an executive role responsible for the oversight of operations and the development of a business strategy. |
• |
• |
• |
• |
|
• |
• |
|
Human Capital Management Experience Experience with compensation, attracting and retaining top talent, development and succession planning. |
• |
• |
|
• |
• |
• |
• |
|
M&A Experience Experience driving strategic direction and growth, including expertise in mergers and acquisitions, capital markets, dispositions, financing, private equity and other business development activities. |
• |
• |
• |
• |
• |
• |
• |
|
Global Experience Global business experience, including an understanding of diverse business environments, economic conditions, and cultures and a broad perspective on global business opportunities. |
• |
• |
• |
|
• |
• |
• |
|
Regulatory/Legal/Compliance Experience Experience interacting with governmental or regulatory entities and/or experience of legal/compliance issues affecting publicly listed companies. |
• |
• |
• |
• |
• |
• |
• |
|
Information Security Experience Experience in management of IT functions, carrying out IT risk assessments and audits, implementing IT security policies and knowledge and management of IT capabilities and risks associated with cyber security matters. |
• |
|
• |
|
• |
|
|
|
Board Composition |
||||||||
|
Age |
61 |
78 |
66 |
70 |
64 |
66 |
61 |
|
|
Tenure (years) |
5 |
16 |
10 |
14 |
4 |
7 |
17 |
|
|
Diversity |
• |
|
|
|
• |
• |
|
|
|
| 36 |
Director Biographies
The following is biographical and other information about our current Directors, including the nominees for election at the Annual Meeting.
Class I Directors
|
Ms. Claudia P. Poccia Age: 66 Director since July 1, 2019 Committees:Nominating,CorporateGovernance and |
Ms. Poccia serves as Chief Executive Officer of Grace De Monaco, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Princess Grace Foundation-USA. Grace De Monaco is a global luxury brand, the net proceeds of which support emerging artists in theater, dance, and film through the Princess Grace Awards program. Ms. Poccia continues to serve on the Board of Trustees of The Princess Grace Foundation-USA.
Since 2018, Ms. Poccia has served as Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Dragonfly Sage, a strategic consultancy advising luxury lifestyle and beauty brands. She has more than 30 years of experience in the global beauty industry. Ms. Poccia also co-founded IdeavationLabs LLC, a beauty incubation platform, where she served as Chief Executive Officer from 2020 to 2021.
Previously, Ms. Poccia served as Chief Marketing Officer and Head of International Business Development for bareMinerals at Shiseido Americas Company. Prior to that, she was President and Chief Executive Officer of Gurwitch Products from 2011 to 2015. From 2009 to 2011, Ms. Poccia served as Global President, Beauty, at Avon Products Inc., having joined the company in 2005 as President of the U.S. beauty business.
From 1994 to 2005, Ms. Poccia held several senior executive roles at The Estée Lauder Companies Inc., including President of Stila Cosmetics and Vice President of Business Development for the Estée Lauder brand. Earlier in her career, she spent seven years at Avon Products Inc. in various sales leadership roles.
Since May 2019, she has been a board member of Fashion Group International, a nonprofit organization focused on the fashion industry. Ms. Poccia has received industry recognition for her leadership, including being named one of Beauty Inc.’s Top 50 Most Influential People in Beauty. She has also received the Cosmetic Executive Women Achiever Award and the Women’s Wear Daily Beauty Biz Award for Innovative Marketer.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior |
Public |
Chemical Industry Experience |
Corporate Governance Experience |
Manufacturing/ Operations Experience |
Human Capital Management Experience |
M&A Experience |
Global Experience |
Regulatory/ Legal/ Compliance Experience |
Ms. Poccia has an in-depth knowledge of the international personal care industry, particularly the beauty sector and has held several senior positions during her career. She brings industry knowledge and marketing expertise to the Company.
For additional detail see our Board Skills Matrix on page 34.
|
| 37 |
|
Ms. Elizabeth K. Arnold Age: 61 Director since November 2, 2020 Committees: Audit Committee, Nominating, |
Ms. Arnold has served as an independent Director of FreightCar America, Inc., a railroad freight car manufacturer and parts supplier, since 2019, serves as its audit committee chairperson and serves on the nominating and corporate governance committee and compensation committee. From October 2014 to 2019, Ms. Arnold served as the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Houghton International, a specialty chemical company with international operations where she also had responsibility for the information technology department. From October 2012 to April 2014, Ms. Arnold served as the Chief Financial Officer of Physiotherapy Associates where she also had responsibility for the information technology department. Prior to that, Ms. Arnold served as the Chief Financial Officer of Tyco Flow Control from April 2010 to September 2012, having previously served as the Vice President, Corporate Financial Planning & Analysis at Tyco International. Earlier in her career, Ms. Arnold served in numerous roles, including executive leadership positions, for GE, a global high-tech industrial company with products and services ranging from aircraft engines, power generation and oil and gas production to medical imaging.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior |
Financial |
Public |
Chemical |
Corporate |
Manufacturing/ |
Human |
M&A |
Global |
Regulatory/ |
Information Security Experience |
Ms. Arnold has an in-depth knowledge of the chemical industry and has held several senior management positions during her career. She brings industry knowledge and financial expertise and experience in information technology, including cyber security, to the Company.
For additional detail, see our Board Skills Matrix on page 34.
Class II Directors
|
Mr. Milton C. Blackmore Age: 78 Director since June 1, 2010, Chairman of the Board Committees: Compensation Committee, Audit Committee |
Mr. Blackmore serves as Non-Executive Chairman of the Company. Mr. Blackmore was most recently the Senior Vice President, Marketing and Product Supply for Sinclair Oil Corporation, one of the largest independent oil companies in the U.S. Sinclair recently merged with Holly Frontier of Dallas, TX, which is now known as HF Sinclair Corporation. Mr. Blackmore served on its board of directors until his retirement in 2009, having previously held a number of senior marketing roles within that company. He was also Chairman of Sinclair Marketing Inc., which is Sinclair Oil Corporation’s convenience store business. Before joining Sinclair in 1995, Mr. Blackmore was with Kerr- McGee Refining Corporation for twenty-six years, progressing through a variety of accounting, marketing and general management positions, ultimately serving as General Manager, Branded Marketing for three years. Mr. Blackmore has a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Panhandle State University in Oklahoma.
|
| 38 |
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior |
Financial |
Chemical |
Corporate |
Manufacturing/ |
Human |
M&A |
Global |
Regulatory/ |
Mr. Blackmore has an in-depth knowledge of the chemical industry, particularly the oil sector and has held several senior positions during his career. He brings industry knowledge, financial and marketing expertise to the Company.
For additional detail, see our Board Skills Matrix on page 34.
|
Mr. Leslie J. Parrette Age: 64 Director since January 1, 2022 Committees: Compensation Committee, Nominating, |
Mr. Parrette is currently the President of One Page Thinking, a data visualization company he founded in 2003. For more than 20 years, he has served as General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer for several public companies in domestic and international markets across a variety of industries, including energy trading, electric and gas utilities, natural gas pipelines, aluminum manufacturing, and electrical product distribution. In 2005, he joined Novelis Inc., a subsidiary of Hindalco Industries Ltd., an aluminum rolling and recycling company serving as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Compliance Officer, and Corporate Secretary until 2020. Prior to this, in 2000, Mr. Parrette joined Aquila, Inc., an international electricity and natural gas utility company, as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary. In 1992, he joined Blackwell Sanders, LLP as a Senior Partner and Chair of the law firm’s International Committee. He is a member of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee and the Compensation Committee. Mr. Parrette has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Sociology from Harvard College and a J.D. degree from Harvard Law School.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior |
Corporate |
Human |
M&A |
Global |
Regulatory/ |
Information Security Experience |
Mr. Parrette brings significant legal, compliance and governance expertise to the Board, which is invaluable in a heavily regulated industry in which the Company operates.
For additional detail, see our Board Skills Matrix on page 34
|
| 39 |
Class III Directors
|
Mr. David F. Landless Age: 66 Director since January 1, 2016 Committees: Audit Committee (Chair), Nominating, |
Mr. Landless was the Group Finance Director for Bodycote plc, a U.K. listed company, which provides thermal processing services globally for a wide range of industries including aerospace, automotive, oil and gas and construction, for over 17 years until December 2016. From March 2013 to June 2022, he was a Non- Executive Director for Luxfer Holdings plc; a NYSE listed global materials technology company, and was their Audit Committee Chair until May 2019, when he was appointed Chairman of the Board, which role he relinquished in March 2022. In January 2017, he was appointed a Non-Executive Director of Renold plc, a U.K. listed global manufacturer of specialist industrial chain and machinery transmissions and also was a member of and chaired their Audit Committee until August 2021, from which date he became Chairman of the Board. He retired from the Board of Renold plc on its sale and delisting in October 2025. He is also a Non-Executive Director of Ausurus Group Ltd the holding company of European Metal Recycling (EMR), a large private scrap metal recycling company and was appointed to this role in June 2017. Mr. Landless’s early career includes fourteen years with Courtaulds plc, where he held a number of finance roles, ultimately serving as the Finance Director of Courtaulds Coatings (Holdings) Limited from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Landless is a Chartered Management Accountant and has a Bachelor of Science degree in Management Sciences from the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology in the U.K.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior |
Financial |
Public |
Chemical |
Corporate |
Manufacturing/ |
M&A |
Global |
Regulatory/ |
Information Security Experience |
Mr. Landless brings significant financial expertise and knowledge of financial reporting with his wealth of experience as a Finance Director and as a Non-Executive Director during his career to date. Mr. Landless also has substantial international experience in the chemicals, paint and engineering sectors.
For additional detail, see our Board Skills Matrix on page 34.
|
| 40 |
|
Mr. Lawrence J. Padfield Age: 70 Director since December 1, 2012 Committees: Compensation Committee (Chair) |
Mr. Padfield was a principal and Executive Vice President of Blackline Partners LLC, a closely held private equity and midstream logistics and terminal development company, where he served from 2014 to 2019. He continues to hold the position as the Board Chairman of CAP Technologies, a private U.S. company that has developed and markets a ground-breaking technology for cleaning and coating wire, rebar and plate steel, a position he has held since 2018. In June 2025 Mr. Padfield was appointed Board Chairman of Envirovalve Group Inc., a private U.S.-based company that produces and sells an innovative, patented family of pressure relief valves.
Prior to forming Blackline Partners, Mr. Padfield was a founding partner and Vice President of U.S. Development Group LLC, an industry leading biofuel and crude oil terminal development company. Mr. Padfield’s early career includes eighteen years at Shell Oil Company where he held a number of roles in marketing, engineering and product supply, ultimately serving as the Business Development and Acquisitions Manager for their terminal and pipeline business. Mr. Padfield has a degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Missouri.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior |
Financial |
Public |
Chemical |
Corporate |
Manufacturing/ |
Human |
M&A |
Regulatory/ |
Mr. Padfield has almost thirty years’ experience in the oil and gas logistics industry, commercial marketing and business development, and his wealth of knowledge in this sector is a valuable resource to the Company.
For additional detail, see our Board Skills Matrix on page 34.
|
| 41 |
|
Mr. Patrick S. Williams Age: 61 Director since May 11, 2009 Committees: None |
Mr. Williams has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since his appointment to this position on April 2, 2009 and as a Director of the Company since May 11, 2009. Prior to holding this position, Mr. Williams was Executive Vice President and President, Fuel Specialties of the Company from 2005 to 2009 and in addition assumed responsibility for the global Performance Chemicals business in 2008. He held a number of senior management and sales leadership positions in Innospec Fuel Specialties LLC, including acting as the Chief Executive Officer of this business from 2004 to 2009. Before joining the predecessor company of Innospec Fuel Specialties LLC, Starreon Corporation, in 1993, Mr. Williams established a number of businesses and currently holds equity positions in an exploration/oil company and general investment companies and a real estate business. Since February 2020, Mr. Williams has served as a Non-Executive Director of AdvanSix Inc., and as a member of its Compensation and Leadership Development Committee and Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Key Attributes, Experience and Skills:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior |
Public |
Chemical |
Corporate |
Manufacturing/ |
Human |
M&A |
Global |
Regulatory/ |
As the only management representative on the Board, Mr. Williams provides an insider’s perspective in Board discussions about the business and strategic direction of the Company. Mr. Williams has particular experience in the Fuel Specialties, Performance Chemicals and Oilfield Specialties businesses, and brings a wealth of knowledge to the Company.
For additional detail, see our Board Skills Matrix on page 34.
|
| 42 |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Elements of Director Compensation:
In 2025, the non-employee director’s compensation was generally a flat annual fee based on the following arrangement:
Annual Retainer:
•An annual retainer of $200,000, paid quarterly, to the Chairman of the Board.
•An annual retainer of $100,000, paid quarterly, for all other NEDs.
Additional Annual Retainers for Board Committee duties as follows:
•An additional annual retainer of $16,000, paid quarterly, for the Chair of the Compensation Committee.
•An additional annual retainer of $23,000, paid quarterly, for the Chair of the Audit Committee.
•An additional annual retainer of $14,000, paid quarterly, for the Chair of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee.
•An additional annual retainer of $5,000, paid quarterly, to the members of the Audit Committee.
•No additional daily fees for attendance at Board or Committee meetings or calls, except as provided below.
In addition to the compensation arrangements described above:
•NEDs may receive an additional daily fee of $2,000 for additional days provided at the specific request of the CEO.
•Each NED is entitled to reimbursement for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with travel to and from, and attendance at, meetings of the Board or its Committees and related activities.
Annual Equity grant:
•Each NED also receives an annual grant of equity under the Innospec Inc. Long-Term Incentive Omnibus Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”) in February of each year, equal to $125,000, based on the closing stock price for Company stock on the date prior to grant. In February 2025, such awards were equity awards in the form of restricted stock units granted at zero cost. Restricted stock units vest after three years.
•The value of the restricted stock units for the Directors included in the “Director Compensation” table, under the column headed “Stock Awards”; the table discloses the grant date fair value of full value awards made under the Omnibus Plan. The value of the restricted stock units is determined using the number of stock awarded and the grant date fair value for each stock awarded is calculated using the Black-Scholes model, with reference to the underlying stock price, volatility of the Company’s stock price, risk free rate and expected dividend yield. For full value awards with additional characteristics, such as vesting criteria linked to stock market indices or stock price performance, a Monte Carlo simulation is used to model the range of potential outcomes. For further information on the assumptions underlying these grant date fair values refer to Note 18 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
|
| 43 |
DirectorStockOwnershipGuidelines
The Compensation Committee has determined that there should be a minimum stockholding requirement for the NEDs. All NEDs are required to acquire and hold stock valued at the equivalent of five times their annual cash retainer*. Thesestockownershiplevelsmustbereachedwithinfiveyearsofappointment.Attheendof2025,thestockholding for each of the NEDs was greater than five times their annual cash retainer.
*The following shares of Company stock shall count towards compliance with the Minimum Stockholding Levels:
a.Common stock held directly or indirectly for the benefit of immediate family members or in trust for the benefit of such person or such person’s immediate family members
b.Common stock, deferred stock, and/or stock units held in Company retirement plans, deferred compensation plans, IRAs, stock purchase plans, or other deferred compensation plan
c.Full-value awards, including shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units, and/or other full-value awards granted at zero cost and which vest solely based on time
Full-value awards subject to performance conditions, shares of common stock subject to outstanding stock options and other market-priced awards, and other awards which may be granted under Company equity plans shall not count towards compliance with Minimum Stockholding Levels.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2025
|
Name |
Fees Earned or |
Stock Awards |
Total |
|
Ms. Elizabeth K. Arnold |
105,000 |
118,119 |
223,119 |
|
Mr. Milton C. Blackmore |
205,000 |
118,119 |
323,119 |
|
Mr. David F. Landless |
123,000 |
118,119 |
241,119 |
|
Mr. Lawrence J. Padfield |
116,000 |
118,119 |
234,119 |
|
Mr. Leslie J. Parrette |
100,000 |
118,119 |
218,119 |
|
Ms. Claudia P. Poccia |
114,000 |
118,119 |
232,119 |
|
| 44 |
The number of unexercised options and unvested full value equity awards outstanding as of December 31, 2025 for each NED is detailed in the table below:
|
Name |
Number of |
Number of |
Option Exercise Price $ |
Date of |
|
Ms. Elizabeth K. Arnold |
|
1,209 |
0.00 |
02.24.25 |
|
|
782 |
0.00 |
02.26.24 |
|
|
297 |
|
109.42 |
02.27.23 |
|
|
|
594 |
0.00 |
02.27.23 |
|
|
326 |
|
99.68 |
02.21.22 |
|
|
300 |
|
99.97 |
05.06.21 |
|
|
Mr. Milton C. Blackmore |
|
1,209 |
0.00 |
02.24.25 |
|
|
782 |
0.00 |
02.26.24 |
|
|
297 |
|
109.42 |
02.27.23 |
|
|
|
594 |
0.00 |
02.27.23 |
|
|
326 |
|
99.68 |
02.21.22 |
|
|
300 |
|
99.85 |
02.22.21 |
|
|
313 |
|
95.70 |
02.24.20 |
|
|
370 |
|
81.07 |
02.25.19 |
|
|
880 |
|
68.20 |
02.20.18 |
|
|
850 |
|
70.60 |
02.21.17 |
|
|
1,030 |
|
44.18 |
02.22.16 |
|
|
Mr. David F. Landless |
|
1,209 |
0.00 |
02.24.25 |
|
|
782 |
0.00 |
02.26.24 |
|
|
297 |
|
109.42 |
02.27.23 |
|
|
|
594 |
0.00 |
02.27.23 |
|
|
326 |
|
99.68 |
02.21.22 |
|
|
|
652 |
0.00 |
02.21.22 |
|
|
300 |
|
99.85 |
02.22.21 |
|
|
313 |
|
95.70 |
02.24.20 |
|
|
370 |
|
81.07 |
02.25.19 |
|
|
Mr. Lawrence J. Padfield |
|
782 |
0.00 |
02.26.24 |
|
297 |
|
109.42 |
02.27.23 |
|
|
|
594 |
0.00 |
02.27.23 |
|
|
326 |
|
99.68 |
02.21.22 |
|
|
|
652 |
0.00 |
02.21.22 |
|
|
300 |
|
99.85 |
02.22.21 |
|
|
313 |
|
95.70 |
02.24.20 |
|
|
370 |
|
81.07 |
02.25.19 |
|
|
880 |
|
68.20 |
02.20.18 |
|
|
850 |
|
70.60 |
02.21.17 |
|
|
1,030 |
|
44.18 |
02.22.16 |
|
|
1,035 |
|
43.95 |
02.23.15 |
|
| 45 |
|
Name |
Number of |
Number of |
Option Exercise Price $ |
Date of |
|
Mr. Leslie J. Parrette |
|
1,209 |
0.00 |
02.24.25 |
|
|
782 |
0.00 |
02.26.24 |
|
|
297 |
|
109.42 |
02.27.23 |
|
|
|
594 |
0.00 |
02.27.23 |
|
|
325 |
|
99.94 |
05.06.22 |
|
|
Ms. Claudia P. Poccia |
|
1,209 |
0.00 |
02.24.25 |
|
|
782 |
0.00 |
02.26.24 |
|
|
297 |
|
109.42 |
02.27.23 |
|
|
|
594 |
0.00 |
02.27.23 |
|
|
326 |
|
99.68 |
02.21.22 |
|
|
|
652 |
0.00 |
02.21.22 |
|
|
300 |
|
99.85 |
02.22.21 |
|
| 46 |
WHOOWNSOURSTOCK?INFORMATIONABOUTOUR COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP
The table “Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers as of February 15, 2026”, sets out information with regard to the Directors of the Company, our Executive Officers who are named in the “Summary Compensation Table”whichappearslaterinthisProxyStatement(“NamedExecutiveOfficers”or“NEOs”),andallcurrentDirectors and Executive Officers of the Company as a group.
The table “Beneficial Owners at Fiscal Year-End 2025” sets out certain information with respect to the beneficial ownershipoftheCompany’sCommonStockasofDecember31,2025byholdersofmorethan5%oftheCompany’s outstanding Common Stock.
AsofDecember31,2025,excludingtreasurystock,therewere24,884,675sharesofCommonStockoutstanding.To the knowledge of the Company, each stockholder listed in the tables below has sole voting and investment power withrespecttothestockindicatedasbeneficiallyowned,unlessotherwiseindicatedinafootnote.Unlessotherwise indicated, the business address of each person is the Company’s corporate address.
STOCKOWNERSHIPOFDIRECTORSANDEXECUTIVEOFFICERSASOF
FEBRUARY 15, 2026
ThefollowingtablesetsouttheamountofourCommonStockbeneficiallyownedbyeachoftheDirectors,theCEO, the CFO and the other NEOs of the Company:
|
Name |
|
Shares Owned Directly or Indirectly |
Right to |
Total |
Percent of Class |
|
Ms. Elizabeth K. Arnold |
(2) |
2,252 |
1,517 |
3,769 |
* |
|
Mr. Corbin Barnes |
(2) |
6,062 |
3,252 |
9,314 |
* |
|
Mr. Milton C. Blackmore |
(1)(2) |
7,000 |
4,960 |
11,960 |
* |
|
Mr. Ian C. Cleminson |
(2) |
10,977 |
5,425 |
16,402 |
* |
|
Mr. David F. Landless |
(2) |
4,102 |
2,200 |
6,302 |
* |
|
Mr. Trey Griffin |
(2) |
4,023 |
2,804 |
6,827 |
* |
|
Dr. Ian M. McRobbie |
(2) |
35,979 |
0 |
35,979 |
* |
|
Mr. Lawrence J. Padfield |
(2) |
5,923 |
5,995 |
11,918 |
* |
|
Mr. Leslie J. Parrette |
(2) |
3,252 |
1,216 |
4,468 |
* |
|
Ms. Claudia P. Poccia |
(2) |
2,503 |
1,217 |
3,720 |
* |
|
David B. Jones |
(2) |
8,131 |
3,778 |
11,909 |
* |
|
Mr. Patrick S. Williams |
(2) |
172,730 |
66,284 |
239,014 |
* |
|
Directors and Executive Officers |
(2) |
262,934 |
98,648 |
362,582 |
1.45 |
Footnotesto“StockOwnership”table:
(*)Lessthan1%
(1)InthecaseofMr.Blackmorethisfigureincludessharesheldby‘TheMilton&JanetBlackmore Trust’
(2)The “RighttoAcquire”column in thetable representsthenumber of sharessubject tooptions exercisable orrestrictedstockunits subjectto vesting, both within 60 days following February 15, 2026
|
| 47 |
PRINCIPALBENEFICIALOWNERSATFISCALYEAREND2025
Thistablelistsallentitiesthatarebeneficialownerofmorethan5%ofInnospecInc.commonstock:
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
Percent of Class |
|
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street NY 10055 |
(1) |
3,681,666 |
14.7% |
|
The Vanguard Group Pennsylvania |
(2) |
2,953,893 |
11.88% |
|
Allspring Global Investments Holdings, LLC 1415 Vantage Park Drive Charlotte, NC 28203 |
(3) |
2,337,644 |
9.40% |
BasedonareviewoffilingswiththeSEC,theCompanyisunawareofotherholdersofmorethan5%oftheoutstanding shares of Innospec Inc. Common Stock.
Notes:
(1)According to a Schedule 13G/A dated April 30, 2025, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 3,650,446 shares and sole dispositivepower over 3,681,666 shares.
(2)According to a Schedule 13G/A dated February 13, 2024, The Vanguard Group has shared voting power over 41,965 shares, soledispositive power over 2,885,671 shares, shared dispositive power over 68,222 shares and beneficially holds 2,953,893 shares.
(3)According to a Schedule 13G/A dated January 10, 2024 and filed jointly on behalf of Allspring Global Investments Holdings, LLC,Allspring Global Investments, LLC and Allspring Funds Management, LLC, Allspring Global Investments Holdings, LLC has sole votingpower over 2,190,515 shares, sole dispositive power over 2,337,644 shares, and beneficially held shares of 2,337,6442. AllspringGlobal Investments, LLC has sole voting power over 529,931 shares, sole dispositive power over 2,335,589 shares and beneficiallyowns2,335,589sharesandAllspringFundsManagement,LLChassolevotingpowerover1,660,584shares,soledispositivepowerover2,055 shares, and beneficially owns 1,662,639 shares.
DelinquentSection16(a)Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors and “beneficial owners” of more than 10% of our common stock to file stock ownership reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Based upon a review of those reports and written representations from the reporting persons, we believe that each of the Company’s officers, Directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Common Stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them during fiscal 2025, except for the following: (1) each of the Directors (Ms. Arnold, Mr. Blackmore, Mr. Landless, Mr. Padfield, Mr. Paller, Mr. Parrette, Ms. Poccia, Mr. Williams) and each of the executive officers (Mr. Barnes, Mr. Cleminson, Mr. Griffin, and Mr. Jones) filed a late Form 4 reporting the annual RSU grant one day late; such Form 4 for each of Mr. Barnes and Mr. Griffin also included late disclosure of the exempt exercise of a stock appreciation right, and (2) Mr. Blair and Mr. McRobbie each filed one late Form 4 reporting a grant of phantom stock. Each late filing was due to administrative error and was filed no more than two days following the due date.
|
| 48 |
EquityCompensationPlans
Thefollowingtablesummarizesinformation,asofDecember31,2025,relatingtoourcurrentequitycompensation plans approved by security holders, pursuant to which grants of options, full value options, restricted stock, restricted stockunitsorotherrightstoacquirestockhavebeengrantedfromtimetotimeundertheCompanyStockOptionPlan (“CSOP”),PerformanceRelatedStockOptionPlan(“PRSOP”),Non-ExecutiveDirectorsStockOptionPlan(“NEDSOP”) and Omnibus Plan.
The CSOP, PRSOP and the NEDSOP expired in May 2018, and no further options were granted under these plans after that date, although outstanding options granted under such plans remain exercisable until their respective expirationdates.OptionsandfullvalueawardsweregrantedundertheOmnibusPlan.Thisplanprovidesforoptions exercisableforCommonStockandfullvalueawards,suchasrestrictedstockunitsandperformancestockunitsthat are settled in Common Stock, as well as cash incentive awards, which are payable in cash based on stock price.
We do not have any equity compensation plans that have not been approved by stockholders. Additional information abouttheCSOP,PRSOPandOmnibusPlancanbefoundintheCompensationDiscussionandAnalysissectionofthis Proxy Statement.
|
Plan Category |
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) |
Weighted average (b) |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders |
230,892 |
$12.235 |
439,476 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders |
— |
— |
— |
|
Total |
230,892 |
$12.235 |
439,476 |
|
| 49 |
PROPOSAL2–ADVISORYAPPROVALOFINNOSPECINC.’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(Item2ontheProxy Card)
Section 14A of the Exchange Act enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (NEOs), as disclosed in this Proxy Statement including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Tables and related material, in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are offering to our stockholders a non-binding, advisory vote on 2025 compensation for the NEOs, including the compensation of our CEO.
|
The Board recommends |
Innospec’s goal for its executive compensation program is to attract, motivate and retain a talented, highly qualified team of executives who will provide leadership for our success in the competitive global markets we operate in. We seek to accomplish this goal in a way that is aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. We believe that our executive compensation program is strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders as it is competitive with the market, includes both short and long-term awards and is performance based, providing a strong link between executive compensation and the performance of the Company. The Compensation Committee continually reviews the compensation programs for our NEOs to confirm that they achieve the desired goals of aligning our executive compensation structure with our stockholders’ interests and current market practices. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 55 of this Proxy Statement describes the Company’s executive compensation program in more detail. |
We believe that our executive compensation programs are structured in the best manner possible to support the Company and our business objectives. We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our NEO compensation as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and the compensation tables and related narrative disclosure. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our NEOs’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, we will ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual General Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and related material disclosed in this Proxy Statement is hereby APPROVED.”
As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding upon the Company. However, the Board will consider that the stockholders have approved executive compensation on an advisory basis if this proposal receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present or represented by proxy. The Compensation Committee values the opinions that stockholders express through their votes and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions.
|
| 50 |
PROPOSAL3–RATIFICATIONOFTHEAPPOINTMENTOF THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
(Item3ontheProxy Card)
The Board is seeking ratification of the appointment of PwC at the Annual Meeting in respect of the 2026 fiscal year.
The Audit Committee has appointed the accounting firm PwC to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm with respect to the 2026 fiscal year, to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026 and to perform other appropriate audit related services. PwC has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since May 24, 2019.
|
Although current law, rules and regulations, as well as the charter of the Audit Committee, require the Audit Committee to engage, retain and supervise the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Board considers the selection of such firm to be an important matter of stockholder concern and is submitting the selection of PwC for ratification by stockholders as a matter of good corporate practice. If our stockholders fail to ratify the selection, it will be considered a recommendation to the Board and the Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders. A representative of PwC will be available by telephone at the Annual Meeting. The available representative will have the opportunity to respond to questions and to make a statement if such representative desires to do so. |
The Board recommends you vote “FOR” the ratification of PwC as our independent accounting firm for 2026. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Aggregate fees for professional services rendered to the Company by PwC and other global PwC member firms for the fiscal years 2025 and 2024 were:
|
Fee Type |
Fiscal 2025 |
Fiscal 2024 |
|
|
Audit |
PwC |
3.050 |
3,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Related |
PwC |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
PwC |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
PwC |
34 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
3,084 |
3,252 |
Note 1: The aggregate fees included in Audit fees are fees billed for the fiscal years for the audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Company, statutory and subsidiary audits, and review of documents filed with the SEC. The aggregate fees included in each of the other categories are fees billed in the respective fiscal years.
|
| 51 |
AuditCommitteePre-ApprovalPoliciesandProcedures
The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to the AuditCommitteeChairman,providedallsuchdelegatedpre-approvaldecisionsarereportedtotheAuditCommittee atitsnextregularlyscheduledmeeting.Generalpre-approvalofcertainaudit,audit-relatedandtaxservices,which aredetailedastotypeofservice,isgrantedbytheAuditCommitteeateachquarterlymeeting.TheAuditCommittee subsequently reviews fees that are paid for such pre-approved services. Specific pre-approval is required for all otherservicesthatarerequestedofourindependentregisteredpublicaccountingfirm.Theserequestsarereviewed quarterly, and the status of all such requests and services is reviewed with the Audit Committee.
In fiscal years 2025 and 2024, the Company did not make any payments to its independent registered public accounting firm for which the de minimis exception was used.
A copy of the Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy can be found on our website under the heading Corporate Governance atwww.innospec.com/about-us/corporate-governance
|
| 52 |
AUDITCOMMITTEEREPORT
TheBoardhasadoptedawrittenAuditCommitteeCharter.Aspartoffulfillingitsresponsibilities,theAuditCommittee:
1.held meetings with the Company’s Business Assurance function and the independent registered public accounting firm, both in the presence of management and privately to discuss the overall scope and plans for the respective audits, the results of the audits, the evaluations ofthe Company’sinternalcontrols and the overall quality of the Company’s final reports;
2.reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2025 with management and the independent registered public accounting firm;
3.discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC; and
4.received the written disclosure and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committeeconcerningindependence anddiscussedthatfirm’sindependencewithrepresentativesofthatfirm. The Audit Committee has also considered whether PwC’s provision of non-audit services to the Company is compatible with its independence.
Based upon these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, and filed with the SEC.
No portion of this Audit Committee Report shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), through any general statement incorporating by reference in its entirety this Proxy Statement in which this report appears, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this report or a portion of it by reference. In addition, this report shall not be deemed to be filed under either the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
TheforegoingreporthasbeenapprovedbyallmembersoftheAudit Committee.
DAVID F. LANDLESS, Chair
MILTON C. BLACKMORE
ELIZABETH K. ARNOLD
|
| 53 |
INFORMATIONABOUTOUREXECUTIVEOFFICERS
Mr. Ian P.Cleminson
Age: 60
Executive Officer since July 3, 2006
Mr. Cleminson serves as Executive Vice President and CFO to the Company, having joined the Company in February 2002. Prior to this appointment, Mr. Cleminson was Financial Controller for the Fuel Specialties and Performance Chemicals business units within the Company. He joined the Company from BASF plc. where, between 1999 and 2002, he served as Financial Controller of their Superabsorbents division. Previously, he worked as an accountant in private practice since 1989. In May 2022, Mr. Cleminson was appointed as a Non-Executive Director to the Board of Surface Transforms plc, which is a UK listed manufacturer of carbon ceramic brake discs. In May 2025 he was appointed Chair of Board. He also chairs their Audit Committee and is a member of their Renumeration and Nomination Committee. In November 2025 Mr. Cleminson was appointed as an Independent Governor at Edge Hill University and serves as Chair of it’s Finance Committee.
Mr. TreyGriffin
Age: 60
Executive Officer since May 1, 2021
Mr. Griffin joined the Company in January 2005 and was appointed to the role of Senior Vice President, Human Resources in May 2021. Prior to this, he spent 4 years as Vice President, Human Resources for the Americas,having previously been Vice President, Operations for the Fuel Specialties business in the Americas. Before joining Innospec,hespent15yearswithHewlett-PackardandAgilentTechnologiesworkinginarangeofmarketingandsales management roles. Mr. Griffin has a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from Colorado State University.
Dr. IanMcRobbie
Age: 77
Executive Officer since May 7, 2002
Dr. McRobbie serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of the Company, having joined the CompanyinJanuary2002.Between1989and2001,hewasTechnicalDirectorofAHMarksandCompanyLimited,a privatelyownedU.K.chemicalcompanyoperatinginagrochemicalandspecialtychemicalmarkets.Priortothis,he worked in senior research and manufacturing roles for Seal Sands Chemical Co. Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Hexcel Corporation based in California) and BTP plc. (now part of Clariant).
Mr. CorbinBarnes
Age: 53
Executive Officer since May 1, 2021
Mr. Barnes serves as Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Investor Relations, having been Vice President,CorporateDevelopmentandInvestorRelationssinceJune2020.Priortothis,hespentsixyearsasFinancial Controller of the Oilfield Services division. Before joining Innospec, Mr. Barnes was CFO of Independence Oilfield Chemicals,whichwasacquiredbyInnospecin2014.Priortothat,heservedinanumberofseniormanagementand financialrolesintheenergyandindustrialsectorsintheUnitedStatesandLatinAmerica.HehasaMasterofScience degree in Mechanical Engineering from Vanderbilt University.
|
| 54 |
Mr. David B.Jones
Age: 57
Executive Officer since March 1, 2018
Mr. Jones serves as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary, having joined the Company on March 1, 2018. Before joining the Company, Mr. Jones served as Vice President, Deputy GeneralCounselofWestCorporation,andChiefCounselofLennoxInternational,andpriortothathewasaPartner with DLA Piper LLP. Mr. Jones is a Certified Public Accountant and was in private practice with Ernst & Young and PricewaterhouseCoopers prior to commencement of his legal career.
|
| 55 |
COMPENSATIONDISCUSSIONANDANALYSIS
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) is designed to explain the Company’s executive compensationphilosophyandprogramsanddescribesthematerialelementsofcompensationin2025fortheNEOs listed in the “Summary Compensation Table”. The tables following the CD&A contain specific information on the compensation awarded to or earned by the NEOs in 2025. The NEOs for 2025 are:
•Mr. Patrick S. Williams, President and Chief Executive Officer
•Mr. Ian P. Cleminson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
•Dr. Ian M. McRobbie, Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
•Mr. Corbin Barnes, Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Investor Relations
•Mr. David B. Jones, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary
ExecutiveSummary
2025 Results
The past year presented significant challenges for the company, as global economic pressures, geopolitical instability, and industry-specific headwinds impacted our financial results. Despite these challenges, we maintained a strong balance sheet and financial foundation due to the resilience of our diversified portfolio and disciplined capital allocation strategy. We continued to return capital to shareholders through increased dividends and meaningful share repurchases, underscoring our confidence in the long-term health of the business.
|
Key Accomplishment |
Description |
|
Net Cash |
Ended the year with net cash position of $292.5 million and no external bank debt |
|
Stockholder Dividend |
Increased dividend payment by 10% versus 2024, to $1.71 in 2025, an increase from $1.55 in 2024 and $1.41 in 2023 |
|
Fuel Specialties |
Maintained its strong operating income and margin growth |
|
Performance Chemicals |
Full year revenues up 4% with sequential margin and operating income improvement from third to fourth quarter of the year |
|
Balanced Portfolio |
The Company is in a strong financial position due to our balanced portfolio, and we have the cash to invest in future growth thanks to careful cost management and focus on delivering exceptional innovation, value and service |
CompensationPhilosophy
The compensation philosophy of the Company is to link executive compensation to continuous improvement in corporateperformanceandincreasesinstockholdervalue,whileatthesametimeallowingtheCompanytoattract and retain the executive talent required to successfully manage our business. The overall compensation programis designed to motivate our employees to achieve business objectives and maximize their long-term commitment to our success. In determining compensation for the CEO and other NEOs, we primarily reference market median and considerotherfactorsincludingindividualexperienceandexpertise,individualperformance,internalpayequityand contributiontotheCompany.Refertothe“CompetitiveMarket”sectionoftheCD&Aforamoredetaileddescription of the relevant market data used for the CEO and other NEO salary comparisons.
|
| 56 |
BasicCompensationPractices
Our executive compensation program incorporates pay practices to incent performance and meet shareholder objectives and avoids objectionable and controversial practices.
|
WhatWeDo |
|
|
✔Payforperformance |
✔Target executive pay around relevant market data,whilealsoconsideringtenure,experience, and other factors |
|
✔Emphasizelong-term performance |
✔Maintainminimumstockownershipguidelines |
|
✔Design compensation package with mix of operational and market-based metrics |
✔EngageindependentadvisorsforCompensation Committee |
|
✔Clawback policy adopted by the Company as required by the Dodd-Frank Act and Nasdaq listing standards |
|
|
WhatWeDon’tDo |
|
|
✖Allow directors and executive officers to hedge or pledge Company securities |
✖Pay dividends on unvested Full Value or Restricted Stock Awards |
|
✖Pay tax gross ups to our NEOs |
✖Pay above market interest on deferred compensation |
|
✖Allow option repricing without stockholder approval |
|
CompensationElementsandPerformanceMetrics
The Compensation Committee seeks to achieve an appropriate balance between fixed andvariable compensation elementstolinkasignificantproportionofcompensationtoperformance.Theelementsare designedto provide incentive for our NEOs to achieve goals that are important to the Company’s success. No element of compensation is driven exclusively by tax,accounting orregulatory considerations.Furtherinformation on each of the key components of compensation is given in the Elements of Pay sectionbelow.
|
Compensation Element |
Performance Metrics for |
Rationale |
|
Base Salary |
|
Fixed component of pay based on specific position Salary ranges determined by job responsibilities and performance, and reference to Comparator Group data |
|
| 57 |
|
Compensation Element |
Performance Metrics for |
Rationale |
|
Management Incentive Compensation Plan (MICP - annual cash incentive) |
•80% Corporate/Business performance (Operating Income, Cash Flow) •20% Performance against personal objectives |
Rewards operational performance and profitability Rewards achievement of personal objectives relative to current economic and business challenges |
|
Time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) weighted at 30% of the targeted annual equity grant value |
|
Increases retentive power and overall competitiveness of the Company’s long-term incentive program |
|
Performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”) granted in stock- and cash-settled awards weighted at 70% of the targeted annual equity grant value |
•40% Relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) performance vs Comparator Group •20% Revenue growth •40% Earnings per share growth |
Full vesting requires delivery of long-term financial and relative TSR performance |
BalanceofFixedandVariableCompensation
ForExecutiveOfficers,thetargetis to deliver atleast50%oftotalcompensationthroughvariablepaywithamixof long-termandshort-termincentivesandcashandequitycompensation.In2025,60% or moreof overallcompensation for the CEO and other NEOs was delivered through variable compensation.
Details of our pay programs in 2025, including say-on-pay results, elements of pay and other pay programs are detailed in the following sections of the CD&A.
|
| 58 |
Say-on-Pay
2025 Results
At the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Company conducted a non-binding advisory vote on its executive compensation.Atthatmeeting,approximately96.5%ofthevotes cast supported the resolution. The Compensation Committee noted the high level of stockholder support when reviewing its executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee considers the outcome of the vote, the interaction ofourcompensationprogramswithourbusinessobjectives,inputfromtheindependentcompensationconsultant andexecutivemarketdatawhenreviewingitsexecutivecompensationprograms.Eachofthesefactorsisevaluated by the Compensation Committeeinthe exercise ofitsfiduciary dutytoactinthe best interests ofthe Company.As partofitsregularreviewprocessregardingexecutivecompensation,theCompensationCommitteehas consideredeach of these factors and any modifications to its NEO compensation process are discussed herein.
RoleoftheCompensationCommittee
TheCompensationCommitteeoftheBoardoverseestheCompany’scompensationprogramsandpracticesforNEOs andotherkeyExecutiveOfficersandDirectors.TheCompensationCommitteereviewsand recommends to the full Board approval ofcompensationfor ourNEOs,includingsalary,incentiveprograms,stock-basedawardsandcompensation,retirementplans,perquisites andsupplementalbenefits,employmentagreements,severancearrangements,changeincontrolarrangementsand other executive compensation matters.
TheCompensation Committee reviewsand recommends to the full Board approval of thecompensation structure forourDirectors at leastbiennially, including retainers, fees, stock-based awards and other compensation. This review is discussed under the “Director Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement.
TheprocessesandproceduresfortheCompensationCommitteeoversightofcompensationprogramsarediscussed in the “Corporate Governance” section of this Proxy Statement.
RoleoftheCompensationConsultant
In2025,advicetotheCompensationCommitteewasprovidedbyExequity,anindependent executive compensationconsultancy. Exequity was retained by the Compensation CommitteeandhasmetwiththeCompensationCommitteeatleastonceandprovidedadviceatothertimesduring the year, as the Compensation Committee deemed appropriate. Exequity’s services to the Compensation Committee included, among other things, providing perspective on market trends, analyses of market compensation levels and designs, and confirmation of peer group composition. Any other work undertaken by the compensation consultantfortheCompanymustbeapprovedbytheCompensationCommittee.TheCompensationCommitteehasassessedtheindependenceofExequityand has determined that the firm does not have any conflict of interest with respect to the Company.
RoleoftheChiefExecutiveOfficerandOtherExecutiveOfficers
Each year, the CEO, at the request of the Compensation Committee, provides his assessment of the performanceof the other Executive Officers, including their achievement of individual objectives and contribution to overall business performance. He then recommends adjustments to base salary and other elements of compensation, if appropriate.
The Compensation Committee then reviews all elements of compensation for the NEOs, considering the recommendations of the CEO, as well as market data and information offered by the Senior Vice President, Human Resources (“SVP, HR”). The Compensation Committee also reviews all elements of compensation for the CEO and evaluatestheCEO’sperformanceintheachievementofthosegoals,consideringtheChairoftheCompensation Committee’s review and assessment of the performance of the CEO, overall business performance and results, competitive market data and other relevant information provided by the SVP, HR. The CEO attends Compensation CommitteemeetingsbyinvitationbutdoesnotattendtheportionofanyCompensationCommitteemeetingswhen his compensation is being determined.
|
| 59 |
TheCompensationCommitteemakesdecisionsrelatingtothecompensationoftheNEOs,includingtheCEO,which it recommends to the full Board for approval.
The SVP, HR assists the Compensation Committee by serving as the Compensation Committee’s secretary and providing information on compensation as requested by the Compensation Committee.
CompetitiveMarket
The Compensation Committee reviews competitive market data from two sources, a ChemicalIndustryComparatorGroup(“Comparator Group”) and a survey provided byWillis Towers Watson, as prepared by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant.
The Comparator Group is the primary source of competitive market data used by the Compensation Committee when reviewing the compensation of the CEO and CFO and a secondary reference for other NEOs. The Comparator Group is reviewed at least biannually by the Compensation Committee.ThecompaniesincludedintheComparatorGroupwereselectedbythe Compensation Committee based on several factors, including industry, revenues, and market capitalization. TheComparatorGroupfor2025consistsofthefollowing16companies:
|
•AdvanSix Inc. •Avient Corporation •H.B. Fuller Company •Minerals Technologies Inc. •Quaker Chemical Corporation •Stepan Company |
•Balchem Corporation •Ingevity Corporation •NewMarket Corporation •Rayonier Advanced Materials •Element Solutions Inc |
•Ashland Inc. •Cabot Corporation •Koppers Holding Inc. •Orion Engineered Carbons S.A. •Sensient Technologies Corporation |
As a secondary reference for the CEO and CFO and a primary reference for other NEOs, the Compensation Committee reviews Willis Towers Watson survey data for companies with revenues of $1 to $3 billion in revenue. These are standard Willis Towers Watson data sets and were not customized prior to use.
References to market data in this CD&A, unless otherwise noted, are to these foregoing sources.
ElementsofPay
Our Compensation Committee has designed our compensation program to align pay with performance.Our executives are rewarded for delivery of long-term stockholder value, performance against long and short-term financial targets, and personal objectives aligned to our strategy.
The material elements of compensation for the Company’s NEOs are:
•Base salary;
•Short-termincentive;
•Long-termincentives (consistent of RSUs and PSUs);and
•Other benefits (including retirement and supplemental plans, severance, change in control, employment agreements, and perquisites).
|
| 60 |
Base Salary
AbasesalaryisprovidedtoourNEOs.Thelevelofbasesalaryisreviewedonanannualbasisandisadjusted, if appropriate, to recognize the scope and complexity of a role, market data and individual performance. The CompensationCommitteereferencesthemedian(50thpercentile) and considersotherfactors including individual experience and expertise, overall performance, internal pay equity, and contribution to the Company. We believe this methodology enables us to remain competitive as an employer in our markets without incurringunnecessarycosts.TheCompensationCommitteeviewsMr.Williamsaskeyto theCompany’scontinuedsuccess,givenhisuniqueskillsandexperienceandhislongandsuccessfultenureasCEO and considers these factors in comparison to the relevant market.
Mr. Williams’s base salary was $1,354,500 for 2025, which was not increased from 2024. BasesalariesfortheotherNEOs increased according to the following table for2025:
|
NEO |
2024 Base Salary |
Increase % |
2025 Base Salary |
|
Mr. Ian P. Cleminson |
$495,708 |
5% |
$520,493 |
|
Dr. Ian M. McRobbie |
$293,025 |
15% |
$336,979 |
|
Mr. Corbin Barnes |
$329,188 |
7% |
$352,231 |
|
Mr. David B. Jones |
$386,400 |
10% |
$425,040 |
Annual Incentives
The Company’s Management Incentive Compensation Plan (“MICP”) is a short-term incentive plan, which provides cash payments based on achievement against pre-determined financial goals approved by the Compensation Committee each year. Targets are set for corporate performanceandbusinessunitperformance(whereappropriate)andforpersonalperformanceagainst pre-determined objectives. All payments under the MICP related to the financial performance element are subject to an overall Corporate Operating Income performance threshold. If this threshold is not achieved, no payment relative to the financial performance element is made to any individual, regardless of business unit performance. For grants made for the 2024 year, all payments under the MICP related to the financial performance element were subject to an overall Corporate Operating Income performance threshold of 90%.
Change for 2025
In 2025, the Compensation Committee conducted a review of the Company’s MICP program in coordination with Exequity. The Compensation Committee noted that, according to market practice, the financial performance threshold is normally lower than 90%. Therefore, the Compensation Committee approved lowering the threshold to 80% for the grants made for the 2025 year.
Therefore, allpaymentsundertheMICP for 2025 related to the financial performance element aresubjecttoanoverall CorporateOperatingIncomeperformancethresholdof 80%of theagreedtargetfortheyear;ifthistargetisnotachieved,nopayments related to this element undertheMICParemadetoanyindividual, regardless of business unit performance.
Further,whereanindividual’spaymentundertheMICPincludesafinancialmeasureforabusinessunit,thebusiness unitmustalsoachieveaminimumof 80%oftheoperatingincometargetortheindividualwillnotreceiveanyMICP bonus for that year related to the financial performance element, irrespective of overall corporate performance.
|
| 61 |
Actual MICP Bonus pay-outs are based on the following formula:
Mr.Williams’sbonusattarget was increased to 120%ofhissalary in 2025,andhismaximumpotentialbonusis 276%ofhissalary.Thetarget percentage for the other NEOs is 60% of their respective salaries, with a maximum potential MICP Bonus pay-out as a percentage of salary of 138%. The levels of MICP target bonus are reviewed periodically and compared to the relevant market.
The Financial Performance Multiplier is determined by the following table:
|
% Business Achievement |
Financial Performance |
|
Less than 80% |
0 |
|
80% |
50% |
|
100% |
100% |
|
Equal to or more than 130% |
250% |
TheFinancialPerformanceMultiplierincreasesonalinearbasisbetweenthedatapointslistedinthetableaboveup tothemaximummultiplierlisted.Forexample,a90%BusinessAchievementresultsina75%FinancialPerformance Multiplier, and a 110% Business Achievement results in a 150% Financial Performance Multiplier.
The Compensation Committee reviews the financial performance measures and the allocation between business and personal performance each year to verify alignment with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy. In 2025, the Compensation Committee determined that, consistent with the approach taken in the previous year, the appropriate measures were as follows:
•Corporate Operating Income (before nonrecurring items). This is a measure of earnings and represents operatingincomeadjustedtoexcludecertainone-time/nonrecurringitemsthatarenotreflectiveof our underlying operations for the period in which they are recorded and therefore mask our underlying trends. This measure accounts for 60% of the payout calculation in terms of weighting (75% of the Financial Performance Multiplier). In 2025, items adjusted out of this measure included amortization of intangible assets and UK pension buy-out costs. Exclusionofone-time/nonrecurringitemsduringanygivenyearforthispurposeisapprovedbythe Compensation Committee.
|
| 62 |
•Corporate Free Cash Flow.This is a measure of working capital management and represents corporate operating cash flow after capital expenditure and before the cash effect of one-time/non-recurring items, which in 2025 included legacy costs associated with historical environmental liabilities. This measure accounts for 20% of the payout calculation in terms of weighting (25% of the Financial Performance Multiplier).
•PersonalPerformanceagainstObjectives.AnnualpersonalobjectivesforeachNEOareestablishedbythe CompensationCommitteeand tailored to reflecteach NEO’s specificroleandresponsibilities. This measure accounts for 20% of the payout calculation in terms of weighting (100% of the Personal Performance Multiplier).
Corporate operating income before nonrecurring items and corporate free cash flow are non-GAAP measures. Inaddition,theCompensationCommitteedetermineswhethertheperformancemeasuresforanyNEOshouldalso includeoperatingincomeandoperatingcashflowfortherelevantindividualbusinesses,basedontheNEO’sspecific role and responsibilities. This determination is made at the start of the year. These measures were chosen toaligntheNEOswiththebalancedobjectivesofincreasingearningsandimprovingcashflowthrough workingcapitalmanagement,whichtheCompensationCommitteebelievesarekeytothesuccessoftheCompany. Personalobjectivesarespecifictothebusinessunit(s)orfunctionwithinwhichtheNEOoperates.Inadditiontothe personal element shown in the formula above, ifan individual’soverall performanceassessment forthe year isbelow satisfactory, then no MICP bonus is paid to that individual.
Maximum incentive payments under the financial performance component of the MICP are awarded when the Company or, where relevant, an individual business unit exceeds its target performance measures by 30%.
ThePersonalPerformanceMultiplierisdeterminedbythefollowingtable:
|
Marks out of 50 against Personal Objectives |
Personal Performance Multiplier |
|
46 – 50 |
150% |
|
41 – 45 |
125% |
|
36 – 40 |
100% |
|
31 – 35 |
50% |
|
26 – 30 |
25% |
|
25 or less |
0 |
InassessingindividualperformanceonpersonalobjectivesforeachNEO,theCompensationCommitteeusesthe following rigorous process:
AnnualpersonalobjectivesforeachNEOareestablishedbytheCompensationCommitteeatthestartofthefinancial year. These objectives are also designed to focus on delivery of high performance, considering the economic and business challenges the Company faces. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the scoring mechanismforpersonalobjectivestomakesureperformanceisappropriatelyrewarded.Eachobjectiveisweighedtogive a maximum potential total score of 50. A good performance on the personal objectives is defined as achieving an overallscoreattheendoftheyearof36to40andearningthetargetlevelforthe20%basedonpersonalobjectives. Achievementof a maximumscoreof46to50representsexceptionalperformanceagainstthepersonalobjectives andincreasesthe20%oftheoveralltargetMICPbonusbasedonpersonalobjectivesbyafactorof50%asshownin the table above.
|
| 63 |
Attheendoftheyear,aspartoftheannualperformancereviewprocess,theCEOreviewstheperformanceofeach NEO against the established personal objectives and makes his recommendation to the Compensation Committee. In the case of the CEO, this assessment is made by the Compensation Committee following an interview session withtheChairoftheCompensationCommitteeandadetailedreviewoftheCEO’sannualself-assessment.Thefinal scoringfortheNEOsandCEOisreviewedandapprovedbythefullCompensationCommitteeandthentakentothe full Board for final approval.
The consolidated financial performance targets set for annual MICP payments purposes and the actual level achieved for the Company in 2025 were as follows:
|
Financial Performance Measure |
Target Set for Annual MICP Bonus Purposes |
Actual Achieved for MICP Bonus Purposes |
Achievement as % of Target |
% of Target MICP Bonus Achieved |
|
Corporate Operating Income (before nonrecurring items) |
$174.868 million |
$151.813 million |
87% |
67.5% |
|
Corporate Free Cash Flow (before nonrecurring items) |
$74.068 million |
$64.516 million |
87% |
67.5% |
The following table summarizes the assessment of the personal performance scores for 2025 performance and incentive payments made under the MICP for 2025 for each of the NEOs.
|
NEO |
Target MICP Bonus |
Personal Performance Score |
MICP Incentive Award |
|
Mr. Patrick S. Williams President and |
120% |
46 |
$1,365,336 |
|
Mr. Ian P. Cleminson |
60% |
46 |
$287,512 |
|
Dr. Ian M. McRobbie Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer |
60% |
46 |
$178,049 |
|
Mr. Corbin Barnes Senior Vice President, |
60% |
46 |
$177,524 |
|
Mr. David B. Jones Chief Compliance Officer |
60% |
46 |
$214,220 |
Thescoreforpersonalperformanceincludesconsiderationoftheachievementofthefollowingselectedrelevant goals and objectives for each NEO. In 2025, the Compensation Committee set personal objectives for Mr. Williams, which focused on the key challenges and priorities for the Company, which included strategic initiatives, financial performance, and compliance.ThesewereinadditiontothefinancialtargetsforCorporateOperatingIncome andFreeCashFlow,onwhich80%ofMr.William’sincentivecompensationundertheMICPisbased.Thekeypersonal performance goals for Mr. Williams are summarized below, together with the actual performance achieved:
|
| 64 |
|
Mr. Patrick S. Williams |
Actual Performance vs |
|
Continue to lead the Company in the implementation of the growth strategy to drive top line growth |
•Drove strong performance in Fuel Specialties, delivering higher sales, improved margins, and increased operating income despite broader market challenges. •Advanced long-term growth initiatives through major technology investments, including the Drag Reducer Agent (DRA) plant expansion, AI-enabled compound database, and predictive customer applications. •Pursued strategic development opportunities and monitoring of transformational M&A options to strengthen the portfolio. |
|
Lead the focus on recruitment, identification and development of high potential employees to ensure we have the talent and resource needed for the future growth of the Company |
•Strengthened succession planning by redesigning the R&T leadership development approach, ensuring deeper technical and strategic bench strength across multiple expertise areas. •Advanced internal talent development through the second deployment of the Senior Leadership Development Program, which produced strong participant feedback and actionable project outcomes. •Initiated global people initiatives—including the Global Employee Survey—to reinforce employee engagement and future recruitment strategies. |
|
Provide leadership to Executive Team and Company to ensure focus on delivery on our targets as a Company and as individuals |
•Took direct, hands-on leadership to address underperformance in relevant business segments, implementing organizational changes, margin improvement actions, and strengthened accountability. •Guided the company through significant operational challenges while maintaining focus on safety, compliance, and disciplined execution across all business units. •Reinforced a culture of operational rigor and strategic alignment by setting clear expectations, increasing involvement in business details, and driving commitment to margin recovery and 2026 performance goals. |
GivenMr.Williams’sperformancemeasuredagainstthegoalsset,theCompensationCommitteerecommendedMr. Williams be awarded a score of 46 out of 50 for his personalobjectives.
The relevant selected key personal performance goals and objectives for each of our other NEO’sare summarized below, together with the actual performance achieved.
|
Mr. Ian P. Cleminson |
Actual Performance vs Personal Goals and Objectives Awarded Score of 46 out of 50 |
|
Provide lead financial support for the diligence, funding, structuring, and integration of acquisitions |
•Evaluated a steady pipeline of M&A opportunities across all businesses, providing technical, strategic, and financial challenge and support to ensure disciplined bid ranges and sound decision-making. •Successfully closed and integrated the Biotechnics acquisition and led major corrective actions at QGP, including a $7M intangible write-down and FX hedge reset that generated nearly $2M in gains. |
|
| 65 |
|
Mr. Ian P. Cleminson |
Actual Performance vs Personal Goals and Objectives Awarded Score of 46 out of 50 |
|
Oversight of SAP deployments and management of associated personnel |
•Assumed Executive Sponsorship of the SAP program, conducted a full cost-effectiveness review, and prepared a Board report clarifying delays, cost visibility issues, and consultant underperformance. •Delivered successful go-lives across multiple global sites and established a new EMEA support model, while adjusting the U.S. timeline and canceling certain deployments to protect cost and business priorities. |
|
Ensure Finance/IT has an adequate development plan to deliver high quality next generation personnel and future leaders |
•Ensured all key Finance/IT staff have development and succession plans, with direct-report succession reviewed and endorsed by the Audit Committee. •Advanced leadership capability by placing six of eight direct reports through the Senior Leadership Program and expanding development opportunities across Investor Relations, M&A, Board engagement, and functional teams. |
|
Dr. Ian M. McRobbie |
Actual Performance vs Personal Goals and Objectives |
|
Develop Biotechnology processes for commercial viability |
•Developed simplified, lower-cost biocatalyst activation and recovery methods. •Secured necessary approvals to initiate pilot-scale production, completing all required documentation and preparing full‐scale manufacturing pending commercial decisions. |
|
Develop Computational Research Toolkit |
•Completed the addition of several million synthetic molecule descriptors and integrated multiple external and internal datasets, creating a uniquely comprehensive and industry-leading data factory. •Expanded predictive modelling across fuels, oilfield, polymers, and surface science, while advancing AI tools for molecule generation, retrosynthesis, and automated data extraction to accelerate R&T workflows. |
|
Continue to develop next generation personnel and future leaders in R&T |
•Provided extensive coaching and mentoring to a broad group of emerging leaders, covering technical leadership, ethics, process safety, and strategic program development. •Established individualized development plans and broadened exposure to senior-level responsibilities, resulting in noticeable improvements in confidence, challenge, and strategic contribution from key talent. |
|
| 66 |
|
Mr. Corbin Barnes |
Actual Performance vs Personal Goals and Objectives Awarded score of 46 out of 50 |
|
Develop and deliver a comprehensive plan to gain exposure to most of the accessible top 20 investors |
•Completed eight investor conferences and Non-Deal Roadshows (NDRs) —including three in-person events—and held meetings with the majority of active shareholders. •Enhanced quarterly IR reporting with new analytics on peer-relative shareholder movements, improving investor insight without incremental cost. |
|
Manage all M&A prospects, enquiries and projects as they arise |
•Closed the Biotechnics acquisition and maintained strong visibility across the full deal pipeline, prioritizing opportunities that are strategically meaningful and appropriately sized. •Strengthened deal discipline by reassessing several targets, while improving due-diligence processes based on lessons learned from the QGP acquisition. |
|
Support the CEO and CFO in all required aspects of corporate development, information gathering, and other projects and activities as determined by the CEO |
•Worked closely with the CEO/CFO to diagnose root causes of underperformance in relevant business segments, quantify corrective actions, and challenge business narratives to drive accountability. •Provided strategic support across Capital Equipment Request (CER) budgeting, SHE transition, and Oilfield Services ERP planning, ensuring decisions aligned with turnaround priorities and avoided unnecessary cost or distraction. |
|
Mr. David B. Jones |
Actual Performance vs Personal Goals and Objectives |
|
Continue to identify opportunities to improve the Compliance Program by using resources efficiently and effectively to revise processes, policies, and procedures to mitigate risks |
•Streamlined the Compliance Program by reducing policy-review and diligence-renewal frequency, simplifying procedures, and reallocating resources toward higher-risk areas such as the marine business, while increasing targeted and in-person training across the organization. |
|
Manage cost of advisors and leverage experience of internal resources productively in compliance and commercial projects |
•Strengthened collaboration between Legal/Compliance and business teams to shift more work in-house, reducing reliance on external advisors and improving efficiency in both commercial and compliance matters. |
|
Control cost of insurance renewals, while maintaining adequate coverage; consider trends and industry standards when setting coverage and rates |
•Successfully completed Property, Casualty, Cyber, and Directors and Officers (D&O) renewals that maintained appropriate coverage levels while controlling premium costs and aligning decisions with market trends and industry benchmarks |
|
| 67 |
Long-Term IncentivePlans
TheCompensationCommitteebelievesthatequity-basedlong-termincentiveawardsareanimportantelement of overall compensation for the Company’s NEOs. They are designed to provide a focus on achievement of performancegoalsthathelpcreatelong-termvalueforstockholders,actasretentionincentivesforexecutivesand, throughtheownershipofCommonStockoftheCompany,encouragestrategicdecision-makingthatisalignedwith the interests of stockholders.
OmnibusPlan
The Omnibus Plan provides for the grant of non-qualified and incentive stock options, full-value awards and cash incentive awards. Full value awards consisting of stock-settled time-based Restricted Stock Unit awards (“RSUs”) and cash and stock-settled performance-based Restricted Stock Unit awards (“PSUs”) were granted under the Omnibus Plan to the NEOs in 2025.
RSUs granted under the Omnibus Plan in 2025 become vested on thethirdanniversaryofthedate of grant, subject to the participant’s continued employment except as described below.Uponvesting,sharessubjectto theseawardsaretransferredtotheparticipant’snominatedbrokerage account.Intheeventtheparticipant’sterminationdateoccursforanyreasonotherthan death, disability, retirement, or an involuntary termination without cause, any unvested awards shall be forfeited, andintheeventtheparticipant’sterminationdateoccursbyreasonofdeath,disability,retirementoraninvoluntary terminationwithoutcause,unvested awards shall be forfeitedunlesstheCompensationCommitteedeterminesotherwise in its sole discretion.
PSUs granted under the Omnibus Plan in 2025 require the achievement of specified performance criteria over a three-year performance period to vest as described below. Additionally, PSUs granted in 2025 are subject to the same three-year service vesting requirements described above for RSUs undertheOmnibusPlanrules,exceptincertaincircumstances,ifaparticipantceasestobeemployedwith theCompany,allunvestedawardsareforfeited.Iftheparticipantceasesemploymentbyreasonofdeath, disability, retirement, or involuntary termination without cause, all unvested awards are forfeited unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise in its sole discretion.
PSUs granted in 2025 consist of both stock-settled PSUs and cash-settled PSUs. For stock-settled PSUs, uponvesting, the number of sharesequal to the number of earned stock-settled PSUs aretransferredtotheparticipant’snominatedbrokerage account. For cash-settled PSUs, upon vesting, the participant shall be entitled to a cash payment equal to the number of earned cash-settled PSUs multiplied by the closing stock price of the Company on the settlement date.
ThecriteriaforPSUsmadein2025undertheOmnibusPlan,wherevestingisconditional on achievement of specific performance measures, are based on relative performance of TSR versusthe Comparator Group,measuredoverathree-yearperiodstartingwiththefinancialyearofthedateofgrant, thegrowthinsalesrevenuefortheCompanyandthegrowthinearningspershare.Totalvestingforthe2025awards is based on the following formula:
|
Proportionofthe 40% |
|
Proportion of the |
|
Proportionofthe |
|
TotalVestingPercentage |
|
| 68 |
The performance components are determined by the following levels of growth, which must be achieved before awards vest:
|
Performance Percentile Ranking of TSR vs. Comparator Group from 2025-2027 |
Proportion of the 40% allocated to |
|
75% |
200% |
|
50% |
100% |
|
25% |
50% |
|
Less than 25% |
0%(nil) |
|
Growth in Revenue in 2027 vs. |
Proportion of the 20% allocated to growth in Revenue vesting |
|
Total growth vs. 2024 actual 30% |
200% |
|
Total growth vs. 2024 actual 10% |
100% |
|
Total growth vs. 2024 actual -10% |
50% |
|
Less than -10% |
0%(nil) |
|
Growth in Earnings per Share (EPS) in 2027 vs. 2024 actual |
Proportion of the 40% allocated to growth in EPS vesting |
|
Total growth vs. 2024 actual 55% |
200% |
|
Total growth vs. 2024 actual 15% |
100% |
|
Total growth vs. 2024 actual -10% |
25% |
|
Less than -10% |
0%(nil) |
Awardsvestonastraight-line interpolated basisbetweeneachthresholdlistedaboveuptothemaximumpercentagelistedineach table.Forexample,atotalgrowthinEPSof -8%versusthe2024 actualwouldresultin 31%ofthePSUsvesting. Innospec TSR performance is compared to Comparator Group companies, and its relative percentile ranking determines the corresponding payout based on the schedule displayed above, with linear interpolation determining payouts between levels listed in the table above.
The grants are issued on a date set by the Compensation Committee each year. This is usually after the public announcementofannualfinancialresults.TheCompensationCommitteedeterminesthegrantdatetobeused in advance and determines the number of RSUs and PSUs to be granted by dividing the target value for each executive (determined as described below in the Grant Policy Section) by the price of a share of stock (the stock price used is typically the closing stock price at the end of the day prior to the agreed grant date).
The Committee does not consider material non-public information when determining the timing or terms of equity awards, nor do we time disclosures of material non-public information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation with such awards.
The RSUs and PSUs granted under the Omnibus Plan are intended to deliver an overall long-term incentive award in line with the grant policy as detailed below.
|
| 69 |
Grant Policy
In setting the policy for fair value of the awards granted under the Omnibus Plan, the Compensation Committee considered market median practice in both the U.S. and the U.K., given the number of executives who are based in the U.K. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee for a particular executive, the grant policy provides for the fair value of the target amounts as follows:
|
Fair Value of Grants of RSUs and PSUs |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
250% |
|
Executive Officers |
110% |
The Compensation Committee determined the actual levels of grant utilizing the following matrices taking account of personal performance where:
|
Rating 1 |
= |
Outstanding performance |
- 150% of policy is granted |
|
Rating 2 |
= |
Exceeding expectations |
- 125% of policy is granted |
|
Rating 3 |
= |
Good performance |
- 100% of policy is granted |
|
Rating 4 or 5 |
= |
Below Expectations |
- No grant is made |
Thepersonalratingimpacts ontheamountofactualgrantawardedasfollows:
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Executive Officers |
||
|
Performance rating |
Fair Value of Grants of RSUs and |
|
Performance rating |
Fair Value of Grants of RSUs and |
|
1 |
375 |
|
1 |
165 |
|
2 |
312.5 |
|
2 |
137.5 |
|
3 |
250 |
|
3 |
110 |
|
4 |
0 |
|
4 |
0 |
|
5 |
0 |
|
5 |
0 |
TheperformanceoftheNEOs,otherthantheCEO,isassessedbytheCEOandtheCompensationCommittee.TheCEO recommendsaratingtotheCompensationCommittee.TheCompensationCommitteereviewstheseandseparately assesses the performance of the CEO and makes a final recommendation on performance ratings for all Executive Officers to the full Board for approval. This provides a rigorous performance-related grant policy, in addition to the performance elements of the grants themselves.
In 2025, Mr. Williams was granted long-term incentive awards at 150% of the policy levels for this role (which means that the fair value of his RSU and PSU grant amount was equal to 375% of his base salary). In the case of the other NEOs, based on the assessment of their individual performanceasapprovedbytheCommittee, all except Mr. Cleminson wereeligible for awards at 150% of the policy level (which means that the fair value of their RSU and PSU grant amounts was equal to 165% of their respective base salaries). To recognize Mr. Cleminson’s increased value to the CEO in his role as CFO, in 2025 the Compensation Committee increased the base policy level from 110% to 125% for his role. Therefore, the fair value of RSU and PSU grant amounts for Mr. Cleminson was equal to 187.5% of his base salary.
|
| 70 |
InlinewiththeCompensationCommittee’spolicy, 70%ofthe fair value of the awardsdueunderthepolicywillbemadeintheform of cash-settled and stock-settled PSUs under the Omnibus Plan, with the remaining 30% made in the form of RSUs.
TheCompensationCommitteehasdeterminedthattohelpmanageburnrates,theleveloffull-value stock-settled awards in any one year should be restricted to a burn rate of no more than 1% of the Company’s stock outstanding with the balance of long-term incentives granted as cash-settled PSUs that do notimpacttheburnrate.In2025,thelevelofRSUs and stock-settled PSUsunderthepolicywaslessthan1% of the Company’s stock outstanding.
Exceptional Stock and Option Awards
TheCompensationCommitteealsohasthediscretiontograntfullvalueawards,optionsandcashincentiveawards undertheOmnibusPlanoutsideofthestatedpolicytoreflectextraordinarycorporateperformance.Inaddition,the CompensationCommitteehasthediscretiontograntfullvalueawards,optionsandcashincentiveawardsunderthe OmnibusPlanoutsideofthestandardpolicylevelsandannualgrantprocessforretentionorrecruitmentpurposes. In 2025, no such awards were made to any of the NEOs.
OtherPayProgramsandPolicies
Stock Ownership Guidelines
To further align stockholder and Executive Officer interests, the Company has continued to require minimum stockholding levelsfortheExecutiveOfficers. In 2025, the Compensation Committee reviewed the company’s Stock Ownership Guidelines which resulted in updates to the Guidelines that align more closely with market norms. TheCEOis nowrequiredtoacquireandholdstockvaluedattheequivalentoffive timeshisbasesalaryandallotherExecutiveOfficersare still requiredtoacquireandholdstockvaluedattheequivalent oftwotimestheirbasesalary. StockwhichisregisteredintheExecutiveOfficer’snameorheldbeneficially in a “street name” on behalf of such Executive Officer as well as unvested RSUs are considered for these purposes. These levels of stockholding must be reached within five years of appointment to an Executive Officer role. At the end of 2025, all NEOs were compliant with the Company’s Stock Ownership Guidelines.
Non-qualifiedDeferredCompensationPlan
The Company offers a Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Plan”). The select group of highly compensated employees eligible for the Deferred Plan is designated by the Company in its sole discretion, subject to top hat requirements. Eligible participants are permitted to elect to defer up to 25% of their base salary and up to 100% of any performance-based compensation which is paid in cash. In 2025, Mr. Williams and Mr. Jones were the only NEOs eligible to participate in the Deferred Plan.
The Company may make discretionary contributions in any given Deferred Plan year equal to the amount of Company contributions that would have otherwise been allocated to the participant under a qualified plan. In this case, such Companycontributionsareequaltotheamountoftheparticipant’seligibleprofit-sharingcontributionsthatexceed IRS employee plus employer contribution limits under the qualified plan. Additionally, the Company has complete discretion to determine each year whether to make an additional annual contribution on behalf of some or all participantsintheDeferredPlan.Otherdiscretionaryemployer contributionfactorsmayinclude,butarenotlimited to,achievementofCompanyfinancialperformanceobjectives.In2026,Mr.Williamswascreditedwithadiscretionary Companycontribution of$38,359,which accruedduringfiscalyear2025.In2026,Mr.Joneswasalso creditedwith a discretionary Company contribution of $38,359, which accrued during fiscal year 2025.
The amounts deferred are credited to accounts hypothetically invested in investments selected by the participant that mirror the investment alternatives available in the Company’s qualified retirement savings plans subject to Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 401(a). Each participant in the Deferred Plan is 100% vested in that portion of their account that is attributable to employee elective deferrals. For participants receiving an employer discretionary contribution, the “3 Year Cliff” vesting schedule from the date of contribution applies.
|
| 71 |
Distribution of a participant’s vested accounts for participants who have reached Retirement (i.e. age 50 with a minimumoffiveyearsofservice)willbeginwithin60daysoftheparticipant’sseparationfromservice,pursuantto theformofpaymentselected(lump-sumorinstallmentsoveraperiodnottoexceed10years)onproperlyexecuted electionforms.Vestedaccountbenefitswillbepaidinonelumpsumtotheparticipant’sbeneficiaryintheeventof theparticipant’sdeathinservice.Aparticipant’svestedaccountbenefitswillbepaidtotheparticipantinonelump sumintheeventofseparationfromservicethatisnotaRetirement.TheDeferredPlanissubjecttotherulesofIRC Section 409A, which restricts the timing of distributions made to specified employees. As a result, commencement of payments to any eligible NEO participating in the Deferred Plan must be delayed for at least six months after separation from service.
Other Benefits and Perquisites
We provide our NEOs with pension arrangements, and life, disability and medical insurance coverage consistent with that provided to all full-timeemployeesorseniormanagers,asapplicable,intherelevantgeographicarea.Inaddition,weprovideacompany car or car allowance to our NEOs in some regions, consistent with that provided to all senior employees in that region.Fulldetailsaresetoutinthetable“AllOtherCompensation”,followingthe“SummaryCompensationTable.”
Post-termination Compensation
Post-termination arrangements vary depending on the nature of the termination event and are designed to be in accordancewith U.S.and U.K.marketnorms,dependingonwheretheexecutiveisbased.Full details aresetoutin the footnotes to the “Post Employment Payments” table.
Employment Agreements
Each of the NEOs has a rolling 12-month employment agreement with the Company. Under these agreements, the Company can terminate the agreement without cause by giving one year’s notice to the NEO. In the case of Mr. Williams,hecanterminatetheagreementbygivingtheCompanyoneyear’snotice,whiletheotherNEOsarerequired to give the Company six months’ notice if they wish to terminate the agreement. The employment agreement for each of the NEOs also includes a “Change of Control” clause. This specifies that, in the event of a change of control of the Company, if the Company terminates the NEO within 12 months after the change of control, or if the NEO terminatestheiremploymentwithin12monthsforgoodreason,theNEOwillbeentitledtoacompensationpayment. IftheCompanyterminatestheemploymentoftheNEOduringthisperiod,thepaymentiscalculatedas24months’ compensation,definedasbasesalary,bonusattargetandanycarallowancefromthedateofnoticeoftermination. If the NEO terminates their employment for good reason during this period, the payment is calculated as 24 months’ compensation, as defined above, from the date of the change of control. In addition, under the rules of the stock option plans, all options would vest on the change of control. The NEOs are treated in the same way as other employees whoholdoptionsundertheplans.Achangeofcontrolisdeemedtohaveoccurredifapersonorgroupbecomesthe beneficialownerof30%ormoreofthecombinedvotingpoweroftheCompany;thereisaconsolidationormerger and the Company is not the surviving company; the stockholders of the Company approve plans or proposals for a liquidationordissolutionoftheCompanyor,if,followingacashofferormerger,themembersoftheBoardceaseto constituteamajorityoftheBoard.Inaddition,undertheiremploymentagreement,eachoftheNEOs,includingthe CEOandtheCFO,issubjecttoa12-monthnon-solicitationperiod,withrespecttocustomersandemployees,anda 12-month non-compete period, from the date their employment with the Company ends.
Indemnification Agreements
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of the Directors and NEOs in furtherance of theindemnificationprovisionscontainedintheCompany’sCertificateofIncorporationandBylaws,whichindemnify thedirectorsandofficersoftheCompanytothefullestextentauthorizedorpermittedbylaw.Theindemnification agreementsprovideforindemnificationarisingoutofspecifiedindemnifiableevents,suchaseventsrelating to the fact that the indemnitee is or was a director or officer or agent of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company or is or was a director, officer member, manager, trustee or agent of another entity at the request of the
|
| 72 |
Company, including any action or inaction by the indemnitee in such a capacity. The indemnification agreements provide for advancement of expenses prior to final adjudication of the claim. To the extent that indemnification is unavailable,theagreementsprovideforcontribution.Theindemnificationagreementssetforthproceduresrelating toindemnificationclaims.Theagreementsalsoprovideformaintenanceofdirectors’andofficers’liabilityinsurance.
All Employee Sharesave Plan
The Company provides a broad-based employee stock purchase plan, which gives eligible employees the right to acquireCommonStockthroughpayrolldeductionsoverapre-determinedperiodatapurchasepricewhichreflects a15%discount(20%forparticipantsoutsideoftheU.S.)tothemarketpriceofourCommonStock as of the beginning of the offering period. In general, deductionsare madeovera24-monthperiod(36monthsforparticipantsoutsidetheU.S.).Noparticipantmaypurchasemorethan $25,000invalueofCommonStockunderthisplaninanycalendaryear.Mr.Williams,Mr.Cleminson and Dr. McRobbie participated in the Sharesave Plan in 2025.
Clawback Policy
In 2023, theCompany adopted aclawbackpolicyas required bytherequirements of Rule 10D-1 (which was adoptedbytheUSSecuritiesandExchangeCommission(SEC)to implement a mandate of Dodd-FrankWall StreetReformandConsumerProtectionAct) and the requirements of the Nasdaq listing standards adopted pursuant to Rule10D-1. The clawback policy requires clawback of erroneously paid incentive compensation paid to current and former executive officers in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements (without regard to the fault of the executive). Restatements that trigger such recoupment include restatements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement applicable to the Company under the federal securities laws and restatements to correct an error in previously issued financial statements that is material to the previously issued financial statements, or that would result in a material misstatement if the error were corrected in the current period or left uncorrected in the current period. Except in very limited circumstances, in the event of such a restatement, the clawback policy requires the recoupment of incentive compensation paid to the executive officer in excess of the amount that would have been paid if the amount of such incentive compensation had been based on the restated financial statements.
U.S. Tax Matters
IRCSection162(m)limitsthedeductibilityofannualcompensationinexcessof$1millionpaidto“coveredemployees” (as defined by the IRC) of the Company with some limited exceptions for compensation paid pursuant to certain arrangements in place on November 2, 2017. For 2018 and after, our covered employees generally include anyone who(i)wastheCEOorCFOatanytimeduringtheyear,(ii)wasoneoftheotherNEOswhowasanExecutiveOfficer as of the last day of the fiscal year, and (iii) was a covered employee for any previous year after 2016.
Aswithprioryears,althoughtheCompensationCommitteewillconsiderdeductibilityunderIRCSection162(m)with respect to the compensation arrangements for Executive Officers, deductibility will not be the sole factor used in determiningappropriatelevelsormethodsofcompensation.Sinceourcompensationobjectivesmaynotalwaysbe consistentwiththerequirementsforfulldeductibility,weandoursubsidiariesmayenterintoormodifycompensation arrangements under which payments would not be deductible under Section 162(m) if the Compensation Committee believes that it is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.
In addition, IRC Section 409A imposes restrictions on non-qualified deferred compensation plans. The deferred compensation plans maintained by the Company are structured to either be exempt from the requirements of IRC Section 409A or, if not exempt, to satisfy the requirements of IRC Section 409A, and the Company has reviewed and, where appropriate, has amended each of its deferred compensation plans to meet the requirements of IRC Section 409A.
Impact of Accounting Treatment
The Company accounts for employee stock options, RSUs, PSUs and its employee Sharesave plan in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For further information on stock-based compensation, see Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
|
| 73 |
COMPENSATIONCOMMITTEEREPORT
TheCompensationCommitteeassiststheBoardinitsoversightoftheCompany’scompensationprocess.The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities are more fully described in its charter, which is accessible on Innospec’s website at www.innospec.com/corporate-governance.
TheCompensationCommitteehasreviewedanddiscussedtheforegoingCompensationDiscussionandAnalysiswith management.Basedonthatreviewandthosediscussions,theCompensationCommitteerecommendedtotheBoard thattheCompensationDiscussionandAnalysisbeincludedintheCompany’s2026ProxyStatementandincorporated byreferenceintotheCompany’sAnnualReportonForm10-KforthefiscalyearendedDecember31,2025.Thisreport is provided by the following independent directors, who comprise the Compensation Committee.
NoportionofthisCompensationCommitteeReportshallbedeemedtobeincorporatedbyreferenceintoanyfiling undertheSecuritiesActof1933,asamended(“SecuritiesAct”)ortheSecuritiesExchangeActof1934,asamended (“Exchange Act”), through any general statement incorporating by reference in its entirety the Proxy Statement in whichthisreportappears,excepttotheextentthattheCompanyspecificallyincorporatesthisreport,oraportionof it,byreference.Inaddition,thisreportshallnotbedeemedtobefiledundertheSecuritiesActortheExchangeAct.
THECOMPENSATIONCOMMITTEE
LAWRENCEJ.PADFIELD,Chair
MILTON C. BLACKMORE
CLAUDIA P. POCCIA
LESLIE J. PARRETTE
|
| 74 |
COMPENSATION TABLES
SUMMARYCOMPENSATIONTABLE
|
Name & Principal Position |
Year |
Salary |
Bonus |
Stock Awards |
Option Awards |
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation |
Change in Pension fund value and other deferred benefits |
All Other Compensation |
Total |
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
|
(5) |
|
||
|
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
||
|
Mr. Patrick S. Williams |
2025 |
1,380,548 |
— |
5,285,623 |
— |
1,365,336 |
— |
221,240 |
8,252,747 |
|
2024 |
1,380,548 |
— |
5,332,447 |
— |
6,293,285 |
— |
210,104 |
13,216,384 |
|
|
2023 |
1,381,048 |
— |
2,870,922 |
1,183,023 |
1,750,014 |
— |
114,856 |
7,299,862 |
|
|
Mr. Ian P. Cleminson |
2025 |
541,147 |
— |
1,002,682 |
— |
274,920 |
— |
155,198 |
1,973,947 |
|
2024 |
497,214 |
— |
872,370 |
— |
1,651,894 |
— |
119,653 |
3,141,131 |
|
|
2023 |
427,929 |
— |
360,206 |
164,626 |
380,453 |
— |
123107 |
1,456,321 |
|
|
Dr. Ian M. McRobbie |
2025 |
309,649 |
— |
559,179 |
— |
170,250 |
— |
82,120 |
1,121,198 |
|
2024 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
2023 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
Mr. Corbin Barnes |
2025 |
342,736 |
— |
604,786 |
— |
177,524 |
— |
78,039 |
1,203,085 |
|
2024 |
314,188 |
— |
412,699 |
— |
871,242 |
— |
44,533 |
1,642,662 |
|
|
2023 |
313,773 |
— |
261,816 |
120,878 |
280,579 |
— |
37,555 |
1,014,601 |
|
|
Mr. David B. Jones |
2025 |
425,040 |
— |
647,866 |
— |
214,220 |
— |
116,088 |
1,403,214 |
|
2024 |
349,210 |
— |
484,326 |
— |
930,628 |
— |
113,829 |
1,877,993 |
|
|
2023 |
348,473 |
— |
288,086 |
133,155 |
317,475 |
— |
96,720 |
1,183,909 |
Footnotesto“SummaryCompensationTable”:
(1) Mr.Williams, Mr. Barnes,andMr.JonesarepaidinU.S.dollars.AlltheotherNEOsabovearepaidinGBPoundsSterling.Forthepurposesofthe“SummaryCompensationTable”,aGBPoundSterlingtoU.S.Dollarexchange rate of 1.24 is used for 2023, 1.28 for 2024 and 1.31 for 2025, being the average exchange rates for the relevant year.
(2) The value of the full value awards for all NEOs listed above for 2025 discloses the grant date fair value of full value awards made under the Omnibus Plan. The value of the full value awards is determined using the number of shares of stock awarded and the grant date fair value for each share awarded is calculated using the Black-Scholes model, with reference to the underlying stock price, exercise price of the awards, volatility of the Company’s stock price, risk free rate and expected dividend yield. For full value awards with additional characteristics, such as vesting criteria linked to stock market indices or stock price performance, a Monte Carlo simulation is used to model the range of potential outcomes. For further information on the assumptions underlying these grant date fair values refer to Note 18 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.
|
| 75 |
(3) The value of the option awards for all NEOs listed above discloses the grant date fair value of options awarded under the Omnibus Plan and the grant date fair value of any cash incentive awards granted in lieu of stock option awards and full value awards as required by the terms of the grant. The value of the option awards and cash incentive awards is determined using the number of options awarded and, for the cash incentive awards, the number of units awarded, and the grant date fair value for each option or unit made in the year. The grant date fair values on Company stock options and cash incentive awards are calculated in the same way as the full value awards above. No cash incentive awards in 2025 were granted at market price.
(4) The Non-Equity Incentive Compensation for all NEOs listed above, for 2024, relates to incentive compensation earned for the stated year under the MICP and the additional Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2022 LTIP”). For 2023 and 2025, the amounts listed under Non-Equity Incentive Compensation relate to incentive compensation earned under the MICP only, as no payments were due in those years under the 2022 LTIP.
(5) The amounts reflected under “All Other Compensation” for 2025 are identified in the “All Other Compensation” table below. Other than where specified below, where any perquisites and personal benefits are provided to a NEO which are not generally available on a non-discriminatory basis to all employees in that business unit, their total value for any NEO was less than $10,000 in the year ended December 31, 2025.
ALLOTHERCOMPENSATION
|
|
Car |
Pension |
Retirement |
Healthcare |
Insurances |
Other |
Total |
|
|
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(4) |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
|
|
Mr. Patrick S. Williams |
2025 |
0 |
0 |
84,498 |
31,964 |
1,328 |
103,450 |
221,240 |
|
Mr. Ian P. Cleminson |
2025 |
17,881 |
108,229 |
0 |
2,538 |
26,550 |
0 |
155,198 |
|
Dr. Ian M. McRobbie |
2025 |
17,881 |
61,929 |
0 |
2,030 |
280 |
0 |
82,120 |
|
Mr. Corbin Barnes |
2025 |
0 |
0 |
46,500 |
29,549 |
1,990 |
0 |
78,039 |
|
Mr. David B. Jones |
2025 |
0 |
0 |
84,498 |
29,529 |
2,061 |
0 |
116,088 |
Footnotesto“AllOtherCompensation”table:
(1)NEOs based in the U.K. are entitled to a leased company car or an allowance in lieu of a car. The allowance is set at £13,650 ($17,881) per annum. Mr. Cleminson and Dr. McRobbie elected to receive the allowance in 2025.
(2)Mr. Cleminson and Dr. McRobbie did not participate in any pension plan due to U.K. government limits on total pension provision, and as a result received a salary supplement of 20% of their base salary in lieu of any pension provision. The amounts paid to individuals are detailed under “Pension Allowance” in the “All Other Compensation” table.
(3)The Company provides a number of defined contribution retirement plans for employees. The amount paid into these defined contribution retirement plans in 2025 for Mr. Williams, Mr. Jones and Mr. Barnes is detailed above under “Retirement Contribution” in the “All Other Compensation” table. No other NEOs received contributions
|
| 76 |
in such plans. In the case of Mr. Williams, Mr. Jones, and Mr. Barnes there is a limit set by the IRS for the amount that can be paid into a qualified 401(k) plan and as a result, the amount paid into the 401(k) plan by the Company for Mr. Williams, Mr. Jones and Mr. Barnes was capped at this limit. In 2025, the amount paid by the Company into Mr. Williams’s 401(k) plan account was $46,500, and $46,500 was also paid by the Company into both Mr. Jones’s and Mr. Barnes’s 401(k) plan accounts. The Company offers a nonqualified deferred compensation retirement plan in the U.S. for a select group of U.S. based highly compensated employees, to include eligible NEOs based in the U.S. In 2025, Mr. Williams and Mr. Jones were the only NEOs who were eligible to participate in this plan. Consistent with the approach taken for all impacted employees who were eligible to participate in this plan, in the case of Mr. Williams, the Company made an employer discretionary payment in the amount of $37,998 into the non-qualified deferred compensation plan, which was equal to the excess amount over the IRS limit which would otherwise have been paid into the 401(K) plan by the Company. In the case of Mr. Jones, the company also made an employer discretionary payment in the amount of $37,998 into the non-qualified deferred compensation plan, which was equal to the excess amount over the IRS limit which would otherwise have been paid into the 401(K) plans by the Company. The amount of $84,498 paid to Mr. Williams, $46,500 paid to Mr. Barnes and $84,498 paid to Mr. Jones detailed under “Retirement Contribution” in the “All Other Compensation Table” are the total amounts contributed by the Company into the 401(k) plan and the non-qualified deferred compensation plan for Mr. Williams, Mr. Barnes and Mr. Jones.
(4)The NEOs are eligible for healthcare insurance and life and disability insurance through programs which are available to salaried employees in the relevant business unit. The cost of programs is detailed under “Healthcare” and “Insurances”, respectively, in the “All Other Compensation” table.
(5)Mr. Williams received payments of $9,120 for business cell phone and work-from-home internet services, $8,500 for medical concierge services, $40,000 for college alma mater suite for home games, $750 for clothing, and $45,080 relating to 50% of the cost of country/golf club memberships.
EmploymentAgreements
Each of the NEOs has a rolling twelve-month employment agreement with the Company. Underthese agreements,theCompanycanterminatetheagreementwithoutcausebygivingoneyear’snoticetotheNEO.In the case of Mr. Williams, he can terminate the agreement by giving the Company one year’s notice, whilethe otherNEOsarerequiredtogivetheCompanysixmonths’noticeiftheywishtoterminatetheagreement.TheemploymentagreementforeachoftheNEOsalsoincludesa“ChangeofControl”clausewhichisdescribedinmore detail in the narrative following the “Post Employment Payments”table.
Inaddition,undertheemploymentagreement,Mr.WilliamsisentitledtoatargetbonusundertheMICPof 120%ofhisbasesalary,withapotentialmaximumMICPbonusof276%.In2025,alltheotherNEOswere entitled to a target bonus under the MICP of 60% of their base salary, with a maximum potential MICP bonusof138%. Each NEO is also entitled to participate in long-term incentive plans which havebeen described in more detail, including grant policy for different NEOs, in the Compensation Discussion andAnalysissectionabove.
EachNEOisalsoabletoparticipateinthepensionarrangementsrelevantforthebusinessunitandcountry where they are based. In the case of Mr. Williams, Mr. Barnes and Mr. Jones, they participate in a Defined ContributionplaninlinewithotherU.S.basedemployeesanddetailsoftheamountpaidintotheplanareprovidedinthe “Summary Compensation Table”. They are also eligible to participate in a non-qualified deferredcompensationretirementplan,inlinewithothereligibleemployeesintheU.S.Detailsoftheamountpaidintothisplanare included in the “All Other Compensation” table and further information is provided in theNon-QualifiedDeferred Compensation table on page 83. Mr. Cleminson and Dr. McRobbie do not participate in the defined contribution planfor U.K. basedemployeesduetolimitsonpensionprovisionsetbytheU.K.governmentandinlinewiththe approach for other impacted U.K. employees, they receive a 20% salary supplement in lieu of pensionprovision.Details of the amounts of salary supplements paid are provided in the “All Other Compensation”table.
|
| 77 |
TheemploymentagreementsforeachNEOalsoprovidemedicalinsuranceandlifeanddisabilityinsurancethrough programs, which are available to most salaried employees in the relevant part of the business unit.Thecosts of these insurances are provided in the “All Other Compensation”table.
In addition, under his employment agreement, each of the NEOs, including the CEO and the CFO, is subject toa twelve-month non-solicitation period, with respect to customers and employees, and atwelve-month non-compete period, from the date their employment with the Companyends.
GRANTSOFPLAN-BASEDAWARDSINFISCAL2025
|
Name and Principal Position |
|
|
Grant Date |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Plan Awards |
All other Stock Awards: No. of Securities, Shares of stock or units |
All other Options Awards: No. of Securities underlying options |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards |
||||
|
|
|
|
Threshold |
Target |
Maximum |
Threshold |
Target |
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($) |
($) |
($) |
|
|
|
|
|
($) |
($) |
|
|
Mr. Patrick S. Williams |
(1) |
(1) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
10,320 |
25,800 |
51,600 |
— |
— |
— |
2,883,924 |
|
(2) |
(2) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
14,743 |
— |
— |
1,440,391 |
|
|
(3) |
(3) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
3,440 |
8,600 |
17,200 |
— |
— |
— |
961,308 |
|
|
(4) |
(4) |
— |
731,430 |
1,625,400 |
3,738,420 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
Mr. Ian P. Cleminson |
(1) |
(1) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
2,004 |
5,009 |
10,018 |
— |
— |
— |
559,906 |
|
(2) |
(2) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2,862 |
— |
— |
279,617 |
|
|
(3) |
(3) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
668 |
1,670 |
3,340 |
— |
— |
— |
186,673 |
|
|
(4) |
(4) |
— |
146,109 |
324,687 |
746,782 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
Dr. Ian M. McRobbie |
(1) |
(1) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
0 |
0 |
0 |
— |
— |
— |
0 |
|
(2) |
(2) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
1,560 |
— |
— |
152,412 |
|
|
(3) |
(3) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
1,456 |
3,639 |
7,278 |
— |
— |
— |
406,767 |
|
|
(4) |
(4) |
— |
83,605 |
185,789 |
427,316 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
Mr. Corbin Barnes |
(1) |
(1) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
1,181 |
2,952 |
5,904 |
— |
— |
— |
329,975 |
|
(2) |
(2) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
1,687 |
— |
— |
164,820 |
|
|
(3) |
(3) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
394 |
984 |
1,968 |
— |
— |
— |
109,992 |
|
|
(4) |
(4) |
— |
95,102 |
276,853 |
636,763 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
|
Mr. David B Jones |
(1) |
(1) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
1,425 |
3,562 |
7,124 |
— |
— |
— |
398,160 |
|
(2) |
(2) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
2,036 |
— |
— |
198,917 |
|
|
(3) |
(3) |
02/24/25 |
— |
— |
— |
475 |
1,187 |
2,374 |
— |
— |
— |
132,683 |
|
|
(4) |
(4) |
— |
114,760 |
255,024 |
586,555 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Footnotesto“GrantsofPlan-BasedAwards”table:
(1)Full Value awards, with vesting dependent on achievement of performance measures, issued under the Omnibus Plan
(2)Restricted Stock awards, issued under the Omnibus Plan
(3)Cash incentive awards granted at zero cost with payout equal to the number of units that become vested, multiplied by the fair market value of a share, with vesting dependent on achievement of performance measures, issued under the Omnibus Plan
(4)Estimated pay-outs under the MICP
•Details of the grant policy and performance criteria for the awards made in 2025 are covered earlier inthe Compensation Discussion andAnalysis.
•The All Other Stock Awards column in the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table details the following types of awards made under the Omnibus Plan:
|
| 78 |
Restricted Stock awards. Restricted Stock awards are detailed under “All Other Stock Awards” in the rows labelled (2). The grant date fair value for these awards granted at zero cost has been determined using the fair value of the Company’s stock on date of grant.
•TheEstimatedFuturePay-OutsUnderEquityAwardscolumninthe“GrantsofPlan-BasedAwards”tabledetails the following types of awards made under the OmnibusPlan:
FullValue awards.Fullvalueawardsweregrantedatzerocost,i.e.withanexercisepriceofzeroand normally vestafterthreeyears,providedthatspecifiedperformance criteriaareachievedassetbytheCompensationCommittee.Thefullvalueawardsaredetailedunder“Estimated Future pay-outs under Equity Plan Awards” in the row labelled(1).
Cash Incentive Awards granted at zero cost. Cash incentive awards were also made in the form of units with payout equal to the number of units that become vested multiplied by the fair market value of a share, and normally vest after three years, subject to achievement of performance criteria set by theCompensationCommittee. Cash Incentive Awards grantedatzerocostaredetailedunder“EstimatedFuturePay-outsunderEquityIncentivePlanAwards” in the rows under the grant date labelled (3) in the tableabove.
In2025,therelativeweightingandperformancecriteriaforboththefullvalueawardsandthecashincentive awards granted at zero costs detailed in the rows labelled (1) and (3) were:
•40% weighting on the relative performance of the Company’s Total Stockholder Return versus the average Total Stockholder Return of the compensation peer group. The threshold level is set at 25% of the average peer group performance over three years, in which case 50% of the full value awards and cash incentive awards granted at zero cost will vest. The target level is set at 50% of the peer group average performance, in which case 100% of the full value awards and cash incentive awards granted at zero cost will vest and the maximum level is set at 75% of the peer group average performance, in which case 200% of all the granted full value awards and cash incentive awards granted at zero cost will vest
•20% weighting on the compound increase per annum in sales revenue. The threshold level isset at a total growth of -10% versus the 2024 actual figure, in which case 50% of the full valueawards andcashincentiveawardsgrantedatzerocostwillvest.Thetargetlevelissetatatotalgrowth of 10% versus the 2024 actual figure, in which case 100% of the full value awards andcashincentiveawardsgrantedatzerocostwillvestandthemaximumlevelissetatatotalgrowth of 30% versus the 2024 actual figure, in which case 200% of the grantedfullvalueawardsandcashincentive awards granted at zero cost willvest
•40% weighting on the compound increase per annum in earnings per share (“EPS”).Thethreshold level is set at a total growth of -10% versus the 2024 actual figure, in which case 25%ofthefullvalueawardsandcashincentiveawardsgrantedatzerocostwillvest.Thetargetlevelissetatatotalgrowthof 15%versusthe2024 actualfigure,inwhichcase 100%ofthefullvalue awards and cash incentive awards granted at zero cost will vest and the maximum level is set ata total growth of 55% versus the 2024 actual figure in which case 200% of the full value awards andcashincentive awards granted at zero cost willvest
MICP. Payment under the MICP is based on achievement of pre-determined financial goals andpersonalobjectivessetbytheBoardeachyear.Thethresholdlevelissetat 80%achievementofthefinancialgoals,andthe target payment is earned for 100% achievement of the financial goals. The maximum payment is earnedfor130%achievementofthefinancialgoals.Thepotentialawardsfor2025aredetailedinthetableintherow underthegrantdateheadinglabelled(4).Asthisisanannualnon-equityincentiveplan,nograntdateisdisclosed.
|
| 79 |
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 2025
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
||||||||
|
Name and Principal Position |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable |
Equity Incentive Plans Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercisable |
Option Exercise Price |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have not Vested |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Vested and are Exercisable |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Vested |
|||||
|
|
($) |
($) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Mr. Patrick S. Williams |
4 |
7 |
1,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
99.68 |
21/02/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
8 |
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
109.42 |
27/02/2033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
7 |
4,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
99.68 |
21/02/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
8 |
|
|
3,979 |
|
|
|
109.42 |
27/02/2033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
15/03/2027 |
|
|
9,726 |
|
749,291 |
|
|
|
3 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
|
|
7,126 |
|
548,987 |
|
|
|
3 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
|
|
8,600 |
|
662,544 |
|
|
|
2 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
27/02/2026 |
|
|
29,179 |
|
2,247,950 |
|
|
|
2 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
|
|
21,378 |
|
1,646,961 |
|
|
|
2 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
|
|
25,800 |
|
1,987,632 |
|
|
|
2 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
12,216 |
941,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
14,743 |
1,135,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Ian P Cleminson |
4 |
7 |
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
99.68 |
21/02/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
8 |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
109.42 |
27/02/2033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
7 |
950 |
|
|
|
|
|
99.68 |
21/02/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
8 |
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
109.42 |
27/02/2033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
21/02/2032 |
|
|
1,425 |
|
109,782 |
|
|
|
3 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
27/02/2033 |
|
|
1,220 |
|
93,989 |
|
|
|
3 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
|
|
1,166 |
|
89,829 |
|
|
|
2 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
|
|
1,670 |
|
128,657 |
|
|
|
2 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
27/02/2026 |
|
|
3,661 |
|
282,043 |
|
|
|
2 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
|
|
3,497 |
|
269,409 |
|
|
|
2 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
|
|
5,009 |
|
385,893 |
|
|
|
2 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
1,999 |
154,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
2,862 |
220,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Ian M. McRobbie |
5 |
11 |
950 |
|
|
|
|
|
70.60 |
21/02/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
12 |
1,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
68.20 |
20/02/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
13 |
919 |
|
|
|
|
|
81.07 |
25/02/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
14 |
789 |
|
|
|
|
|
95.70 |
24/02/2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
15 |
842 |
|
|
|
|
|
99.85 |
24/02/2031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
7 |
842 |
|
|
|
|
|
99.68 |
21/02/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
8 |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
109.42 |
27/02/2033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
16 |
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
75.71 |
19/03/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
12/01/2031 |
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
111,554 |
|
|
3 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
21/02/2032 |
|
|
|
3,791 |
|
292,059 |
|
|
3 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
27/02/2033 |
|
|
3,148 |
|
242,522 |
|
|
|
3 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
|
|
2,991 |
|
230,427 |
|
|
|
3 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
|
|
3,639 |
|
280,349 |
|
|
|
2 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
1,306 |
100,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
1,687 |
129,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 80 |
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
||||||||
|
Name and Principal Position |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable |
Equity Incentive Plans Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercisable |
Option Exercise Price |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have not Vested |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Vested and are Exercisable |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Vested |
|||||
|
|
($) |
($) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Mr. Corbin Barnes Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Investor Relations |
1 |
8 |
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
109.42 |
27/02/2033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
8 |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
109.42 |
27/02/2033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
15/03/2027 |
|
|
886 |
|
68,257 |
|
|
|
3 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
|
|
762 |
|
58,704 |
|
|
|
3 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
|
|
984 |
|
75,807 |
|
|
|
2 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
27/02/2026 |
|
|
2,661 |
|
205,003 |
|
|
|
2 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
|
|
2,286 |
|
176,113 |
|
|
|
2 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
|
|
2,952 |
|
227,422 |
|
|
|
2 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
1,306 |
100,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
1,687 |
129,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. David B. Jones Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary |
4 |
7 |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
99.68 |
21/02/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
8 |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
109.42 |
27/02/2033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
7 |
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
99.68 |
21/02/2032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
8 |
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
109.42 |
27/02/2033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
15/03/2027 |
|
|
976 |
|
75,191 |
|
|
|
3 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
|
|
894 |
|
68,874 |
|
|
|
3 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
|
|
1,187 |
|
91,446 |
|
|
|
2 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
27/02/2026 |
|
|
2,928 |
|
225,573 |
|
|
|
2 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
|
|
2,683 |
|
206,698 |
|
|
|
2 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
|
|
3,562 |
|
274,416 |
|
|
|
2 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
26/02/2027 |
1,533 |
118,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
24/02/2028 |
2,036 |
156,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
Footnotesto“OutstandingEquityAwardsatFiscalYearEnd2025”table:
(1)Options issued under the Omnibus Plan. Option awards under the Omnibus Plan which are not exercisable are detailed in the column headed “Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable” and those which are exercisable are detailed in the column headed “Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable”
(2)Full Value Awards and Restricted Stock Units issued under the Omnibus Plan. The number of Full Value shares awarded is detailed in the column headed “Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested” and the market value of these awards is detailed in the column headed “Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Pay-out Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested”, using the 2025 year-end share price of $76.54 as an indication. The number of Restricted Stock Units is detailed in the column headed “Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” and the market value of these awards is detailed in the column headed “Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have not Vested”, using the 2025 year-end share price of $76.54 as an indication.
(3)Cash Incentive Awards granted at zero cost issued under the Omnibus Plan. Cash Incentive awards under the Omnibus Plan which are not exercisable are detailed in the column headed “Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested” and the market value of these awards is detailed in the column headed “Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Pay-out Value of Unearned Shares,
|
| 81 |
Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested”, using the 2025-year-end share price of $76.54 as an indication. Cash Incentive awards under the Omnibus Plan which are exercisable are detailed in the column headed “Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Vested and are Exercisable”. Market or Pay-out Value of Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Vested use the 2025-year-end share price of $76.54 as an indication.
(4)Cash Incentive Awards granted at market price issued under the Omnibus Plan. Cash Incentive Awards granted at market price which are not exercisable are detailed in the column headed “Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable” and those which are exercisable are detailed in the column headed “Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable”
(5)SEUs issued under the CSOP. These are detailed in the column headed “Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable”
(6)Options issued under the ShareSave plan to non-US participants. These are detailed in the column headed “Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable”
(7)Omnibus Full Value Awards, Options and Cash Incentive Awards have vesting date of February 21, 2025
(8)Omnibus Full Value Awards, Options and Cash Incentive Awards have vesting date of February 27, 2026
(9)Omnibus Full Value Awards, Cash Incentive Awards and Restricted Stock Units have vesting date of February 26, 2027
(10)Omnibus Full Value Awards, Cash Incentive Awards and Restricted Stock Units have vesting date of February 24, 2028
(11)SEUs issued under the CSOP vested on February 21, 2020
(12)SEUs issued under the CSOP vested on February 20, 2021
(13)Omnibus Full Value Awards, Options and Cash Incentive Awards vested on February 25, 2022
(14)Omnibus Full Value Awards, Options and Cash Incentive Awards vested on February 24, 2023
(15)Omnibus Full Value Awards, Options and Cash Incentive Awards vested on February 22, 2024
(16)Options issued under the ShareSave plan to non-US participants vested on November 1, 2025
(17)Additional Cash Incentive Awards vested on December 1, 2022
With respect to non-vested or unearned performance based stock options, full value awards, cash incentive awards and SEUs, the number of shares, cash incentive awards and SEUs reported as of December 31, 2025 in the table is based on target performance achieved for each performance goal in the previous fiscal year (2025).
The market value of any shares which have not vested is calculated using the year-end stock price of $76.54 as an indication.
|
| 82 |
OPTIONEXERCISESANDSTOCKVESTEDDURINGFISCAL YEAR 2025
The following table provides information for the NEOs on exercises of stock options and cash-based awards, which were granted as SEUs during the fiscal year 2025, including the number of shares or SEUs acquired on exercise or transfer and the value realized.
|
Name and Principal Position |
|
Option Awards |
Stock Awards |
||
|
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise |
Value Realized on Exercise |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting |
Value Realized on Exercise |
|
|
|
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
|
Mr. Patrick S. Williams |
(1) |
— |
— |
10,097 |
1,001,319 |
|
President and Chief |
(4) |
30,292 |
3,140,069 |
— |
— |
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Ian P. Cleminson |
(4) |
4,275 |
431,690 |
— |
0 |
|
Executive Vice President and |
|
— |
— |
— |
0 |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
— |
— |
— |
0 |
|
Dr. Ian M. McRobbie |
|
— |
— |
— |
0 |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer |
|
— |
— |
— |
0 |
|
Mr. Corbin Barnes |
(1) |
— |
— |
897 |
92,714 |
|
Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and |
(2) |
— |
— |
200 |
736 |
|
Chief Technology Officer |
(3) |
— |
— |
598 |
2,021 |
|
(4) |
2,000 |
183,060 |
— |
0 |
|
|
(4) |
2,692 |
278,084 |
— |
0 |
|
|
Mr. David B. Jones |
(1) |
— |
— |
1,030 |
105,050 |
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief |
(4) |
3,091 |
319,300 |
— |
0 |
|
Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
Footnotes to the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested during Fiscal 2025” table:
(1)Cash incentive awards exercised which were issued at zero cost under the Omnibus Plan
(2)Cash incentive awards exercised which were issued at market price under the Omnibus Plan
(3)Options exercised which were issued under the Omnibus Plan
(4)Full Value awards transferred which were issued under the Omnibus Plan
Theaggregatedollaramountrealizedonexerciseofoptionawards,SEUsandmatchingshareswascomputedbycalculatingtheclosingpriceofallunderlyingcommonstockonthedateofexerciseortransfer,lessthe exercisepriceoftheoption,multipliedbythenumberofsharesunderlyingtheoptionsorSEUsexercised,or stocktransferred.
|
| 83 |
NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
The following table provides information regarding The Innospec Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan duringfiscalyear2025. In 2025, Mr. Williams, Mr. Jones, and Mr. Barnes were the only NEOs eligible to participate in the Deferred Plan. Mr. Barnes chose not to participate in the Plan in 2025. More information on the plan is provided in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the Proxy under the section headed “Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan”.
|
Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year |
Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year |
Aggregate Earnings (Losses) in Last Fiscal Year |
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions |
Aggregate Balance at end of last Fiscal Year 2023 |
|
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
|
|
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
|
|
Mr. Patrick S. Williams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
— |
37,998 |
27,378 |
— |
221,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. David B. Jones |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance |
25,040 |
37,998 |
28,144 |
— |
187,306 |
|
Officer and Corporate Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
Footnotes to the “Non-qualified Deferred Compensation” table
(1)These amounts, if any, are included in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Salary” and “Non-Equity Incentive Compensation” columns for 2025. Mr. Williams did not make any contributions into the Deferred Compensation plan in 2025.
(2)The amounts disclosed for Mr. Williams and Mr. Jones include employer elective deferrals of $37,998 for both, which accrued during fiscal year 2025 and credited to their accounts in 2026. These amounts are included in the Summary Compensation Table in the “All Other Compensation” column for 2025.
(3)These amounts are not included in the Summary Compensation Table because Plan earnings were not preferential or above market.
(4)Withdrawal and distribution amounts, if any, are not included in the Summary Compensation Table because these are pay-outs of prior years’ earnings and contributions. There were no withdrawals or distributions in 2025.
(5)These amounts are as of December 31, 2025, and do not take into account the amounts in the “Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year” column in the table above that were accrued during fiscal year 2025 but were credited to Mr. Williams’s and Mr. Jones’s accounts in 2026 as detailed above.
|
| 84 |
POST EMPLOYMENT PAYMENTS
The following table quantifies the potential payments upon termination or change of control that any of our NEOs would receive if the relevant termination event had occurred on December 31, 2025. Thepotential payments relating to vested and unvested stock options and full value awards include payments relating to cash incentive awards as well as options and full value awards.
|
Name and Principal Position |
Benefit |
Retirement |
Termination without |
Termination in event of Change of Control |
Death in Service |
|
|
($) |
($) |
($) |
($) |
|
|
Mr. Patrick S. Williams |
Cash Severance - Salary |
|
|
|
|
|
and benefits |
0 |
1,354,500 |
2,709,000 |
0 |
|
|
Cash Severance - Bonus |
0 |
1,625,400 |
3,250,800 |
0 |
|
|
Vested Equity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Unvested Equity |
0 |
0 |
9,920,287 |
9,920,287 |
|
|
Life Insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
750,000 |
|
|
Total |
0 |
2,979,900 |
15,880,087 |
10,670,287 |
|
|
Mr. Ian P. Cleminson |
Cash Severance - Salary |
|
|
|
|
|
and benefits |
0 |
563,358 |
1,126,715 |
0 |
|
|
Cash Severance - Bonus |
0 |
327,286 |
654,571 |
0 |
|
|
Vested Equity |
0 |
0 |
109,782 |
109,782 |
|
|
Unvested Equity |
0 |
0 |
1,624,311 |
1,624,311 |
|
|
Life Insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,272,857 |
|
|
Total |
0 |
890,644 |
3,515,379 |
5,006,950 |
|
|
Dr. Ian M. McRobbie |
Cash Severance - Salary |
|
|
|
|
|
and benefits |
0 |
355,681 |
711,361 |
0 |
|
|
Cash Severance - Bonus |
0 |
202,680 |
405,359 |
0 |
|
|
Vested Equity |
16,542 |
16,542 |
420,155 |
420,155 |
|
|
Unvested Equity |
0 |
0 |
983,878 |
983,878 |
|
|
Life Insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,026,795 |
|
|
Total |
16,542 |
574,903 |
2,520,753 |
3,430,828 |
|
|
Mr. Corbin Barnes |
Cash Severance - Salary |
|
|
|
|
|
and benefits |
0 |
352,231 |
704,462 |
0 |
|
|
Cash Severance - Bonus |
0 |
211,339 |
422,677 |
0 |
|
|
Vested Equity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Unvested Equity |
0 |
0 |
1,041,889 |
1,041,889 |
|
|
Life Insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
750,000 |
|
|
Total |
0 |
563,570 |
2,169,028 |
1,791,889 |
|
|
Mr. David B. Jones |
Cash Severance - Salary |
|
|
|
|
|
and benefits |
0 |
425,040 |
850,080 |
0 |
|
|
Cash Severance - Bonus |
0 |
255,024 |
510,048 |
0 |
|
|
Vested Equity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Unvested Equity |
0 |
0 |
1,217,155 |
1,217,155 |
|
|
Life Insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
750,000 |
|
|
Total |
0 |
680,064 |
2,577,283 |
1,967,155 |
|
| 85 |
Footnotes to “Post Employment Payments” table:
•In the case of resignation or dismissal for cause, none of the NEOs would be entitled to any post-employment payments from the Company.
•The NEOs are treated in line with all other employees in the event of retirement or change of control in terms of payments relating to stock options, full value awards and cash incentive awards. In the case of retirement, under the rules of the Omnibus Plan, any Omnibus options or cash incentive awards granted at market price will vest and become exercisable; while under the rules of the Omnibus Plan full value awards or cash incentive awards granted at zero price which have not vested will lapse, unless the Compensation Committee deems it appropriate to exercise their discretion and allow a proportion of unvested awards to vest. The amounts detailed in the table above assume no such discretion has been exercised. The value of any stock options, full value awards and cash incentive awards which will become exercisable under each scenario, using the 2025-year-end stock price of $76.54, is included in the table above, as an indication.
•The employment agreement for each NEO includes a change of control clause. This specifies that, in the event of a change of control of the Company, if the Company terminates the NEO within twelve months of the change of control, or if the NEO terminates his employment within twelve months for good cause, the NEO will be entitled to a compensation payment. If the Company terminates the employment of the NEO during this period, the payment is calculated as twenty-four months compensation defined as base salary, bonus at target and any car allowance from the date of notice of termination. If the NEO terminates his employment, the payment is calculated as twenty-four months’ compensation, defined as above, from the date of the change of control. In addition, under the rules of the Omnibus Plan, all options, full value awards and cash incentive awards would vest upon termination due to the change of control. The NEOs are treated in the same way as other employees who hold options, full value awards or cash incentive awards under the plans. Change of control is deemed to have occurred if a person or group becomes the beneficial owner of 30% or more of the combined voting power of the Company; there is a consolidation or merger and the Company is not the surviving Company; the stockholders of the Company approve plans or proposals for a liquidation or dissolution of the Company or, if following a cash offer or merger, the members of the Board cease to constitute a majority of the Board. The amounts detailed in the Post Employment Payments table include the compensation payments and the value of any stock options, full value awards and cash incentive awards which will become exercisable in these scenarios, using the 2025-year-end stock price of $76.54 as an indication.
•NEOs based in the U.K. are provided with life insurance cover at six times their base salary if they die in service. In the case of the NEOs based in the U.S., the death in service cover is two times base salary, with the maximum payment capped at $750,000. The amount of these potential payments for each NEO is included in the table above, as an indication.
•If the Company terminates the employment of a NEO without cause, the NEO would normally be eligible for a severance payment to cover loss of salary and other direct compensation for the duration of the notice period specified in their employment agreement. All the NEOs have a twelve-month notice period. In addition, in line with the rules of the Omnibus Plan, any Omnibus options and cash incentive awards granted at market price would vest and the NEO would have twelve months from the date of termination to exercise these and any vested options and vested cash incentive awards granted at market price under any of the share plans. With regards to the options, full value awards and cash incentive awards, the NEOs are treated the same way as other employees who hold options, full value awards and cash incentive awards under the plans. The amounts detailed in the post-employment payments table include the severance payments and the value of any share options, full value awards and cash incentive awards which will become exercisable, using the 2025-year-end stock price of $76.54.
|
| 86 |
PAYVERSUSPERFORMANCE
As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providingthe following information about the relationshipbetween compensation actually paid (CAP), as defined in Item 402(v), and performance.
|
Year (a) |
Summary Compensation Table Total |
Compensation Actually |
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO Named Executive Officers1 |
Average Compensation Actually Paid to |
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: |
Net |
Corporate Operating Income6 (millions) |
|
|
Total |
Peer Group |
|||||||
|
2025 |
$8,253,108 |
$5,503,148 |
$1,425,451 |
$1,109,140 |
$91 |
$109 |
$116.6 |
$151.8 |
|
2024 |
$13,216,384 |
$11,169,734 |
$2,282,244 |
$2,148,332 |
$128 |
$108 |
$35.6 |
$209.4 |
|
2023 |
$7,299,862 |
$10,144,030 |
$1,253,550 |
$1,604,203 |
$141 |
$110 |
$139.1 |
$182.1 |
|
2022 |
$7,888,489 |
$11,227,698 |
$1,375,137 |
$1,771,361 |
$116 |
$96 |
$133.0 |
$213.3 |
|
2021 |
$9,897,900 |
$6,603,590 |
$1,668,578 |
$1,305,876 |
$101 |
$128 |
$93.1 |
$131.2 |
| (1) | The PEO listed for 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 is Patrick S. Williams. The Non-PEO remaining NEOs for 2025 are Ian P. Cleminson, Ian M. McRobbie, Corbin Barnes, and David B. Jones. The Non-PEO remaining NEOs for 2023 and 2024 are Ian P. Cleminson, Philip J. Boon, Corbin Barnes, and David B. Jones. The Non-PEO remaining NEOs for 2021 and 2022 are Ian P. Cleminson, Philip J. Boon, Ian M. McRobbie, and David B. Jones. |
| (2) | The following adjustments relating to equity awards were made to total compensation for 2025 to determine CAP: |
| (3) | For 2025, no adjustments were made relating to defined benefit and pension plans to determine CAP. |
| (4) | Represents the cumulative TSR for the S&P Composite 1500 Specialty Chemicals Index, as disclosed by Innospec for the purposes of Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K. |
| (5) | The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year (GAAP Net Income). |
| (6) | Corporate Operating Income is the financial performance measure used by the Company in the most recently completed fiscal year to link CAP to the Company’s performance. Corporate Operating Income is calculated from GAAP Operating Income adjusted to exclude certain one-time/nonrecurring costs that are not reflective of the Company’s underlying operations, as further described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. |
(1)The PEO listed for 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 is Patrick S. Williams. The Non-PEO remaining NEOs for 2025 are Ian P. Cleminson, Ian M. McRobbie, Corbin Barnes, and David B. Jones. The Non-PEO remaining NEOs for 2023 and 2024 are Ian P. Cleminson, Philip J. Boon, Corbin Barnes, and David B. Jones. The Non-PEO remaining NEOs for 2021 and 2022 are Ian P. Cleminson, Philip J. Boon, Ian M. McRobbie, and David B. Jones.
(2)The following adjustments relating to equity awards were made to total compensation for 2025 to determine CAP:
|
Year |
Value of Equity Awards Disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table |
Year End Value of Equity Awards Granted During the Covered Year |
Change in Fair |
Change in Fair Value from Prior Year End Fair Value of Awards Granted in Prior Years Vesting During the Covered Year |
Total Equity Award Adjustments |
|
2025 PEO |
($5,285,623) |
$4,394,222 |
($1,734,947) |
($123,611) |
($2,749,960) |
|
2025 Average Non-PEO NEOs |
($703,628) |
$606,870 |
($195,422) |
($24,132) |
($316,312) |
(a) The valuation methodologies used to calculate fair values for each measurement date do not materially differ from those used at the time of grant of each respective award.
(3)For 2025, no adjustments were made relating to defined benefit and pension plans to determine CAP.
(4)Represents the cumulative TSR for the S&P Composite 1500 Specialty Chemicals Index, as disclosed by Innospec for the purposes of Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K.
(5)The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year (GAAP Net Income).
(6)Corporate Operating Income is the financial performance measure used by the Company in the most recently completed fiscal year to link CAP to the Company’s performance. Corporate Operating Income is calculated from GAAP Operating Income adjusted to exclude certain one-time/nonrecurring costs that are not reflective of the Company’s underlying operations, as further described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
|
| 87 |
AnalysisoftheInformationPresentedinthePayversusPerformanceTable
The graphics below depict the relationship between CAP and Company TSR, S&P Composite 1500 Specialty Chemicals Index TSR (referred to as the “peer group TSR” for purposes of 402(v)), and financial performance.
TabularListofFinancialPerformanceMeasures
The most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link executive CAP to the Company’s PEO and NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to the Company’s performance are as follows:
•Corporate Operating Income
•EPS
•Cash Flow
•Revenue
•Relative TSR
|
| 88 |
Pay RatioDisclosure
In line with the SEC disclosure requirements, the Company has determined the ratio of the totalannualcompensationofMr.Williams,CEO,tothetotalannualcompensationofthemedianemployeefor2023,the last completed fiscal year.
In2025,thetotalannualcompensationoftheCEOwas$8,253,108.Thetotalannualcompensationofthe medianemployeewas$104,479. Asaresult,for2025,theratiooftheCEO’stotalannualcompensationtothe total annual compensation of the median employee was approximately 79 to1.
The median employee was identified by examining compensation information derived from payroll records forall employees, excluding the CEO, who was employed by the Company on November 1, 2023. As of suchdate, the Company employed approximately 2,100 people, with around 720 of these employees located in theUnitedStates and around 1,380 located outside the United States. All employees were included, whether employedonafull-time,part-time,temporary,orseasonalbasis.Inidentifyingthemedianemployee,theCompanyselected actual cash compensation for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2022 as the most appropriatemeasure of compensation, as there has been no change in the employee population or compensation arrangementsthatwouldhaveresultedinasignificantchangeinthepaydistributiontotheworkforce.Cashcompensationwas definedasbasesalary(forsalariedemployees),wages(forhourlyemployees),bonusandincentivepayments earnedin2022,andanycashallowancesincludingshiftallowance,carallowanceandresponsibilityallowance,butexcludinganypaymentsrelatingtostock-based incentives.Inthecaseswhereanindividualwasemployed on November 1, 2023, but had not been employed in 2022, the 2022 compensation of an employee in asimilarrole and location was used as an estimate. In the cases where a full time or part time permanent employeewas not employed by the Company for all of 2022, the compensation was annualized. Compensation wasnotanalyzed for any temporary or seasonal workers. This measure was consistently applied to allemployees included in thecalculation.
To determine the annual total compensation of the CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” columnoftheSummaryCompensationTableinthisProxyStatement,whichincludessalary,stockandoptionawards, bonus, change in pension value, and all other compensation. The median employee’s totalannualcompensationfor2025wascalculatedinaccordancewiththesamerequirementsapplicabletotheCEO’s compensationasreportedintheSummaryCompensationTableandthatnumberwasusedtocalculatethe ratio of the CEO’s pay to that of the medianemployee.
TheSECrulesrequiringpayratiodisclosureallowcompaniestoexerciseasignificantamountofflexibilityinmakingthedeterminationastowhoisthemedianemployeeanddonotmandatethateachcompanyusethe same method. We believe that the pay ratio above is a reasonable estimate calculated in amanner consistentwiththeSECrules.However,thetotalannualcompensationofourmedianemployeeisuniquetothatpersonandisnotnecessarilyagoodindicatorofthetotalannualcompensationofanyoftheother employeesoftheCompany,anditisnotcomparabletotheannualtotalcompensationofemployeesatother companies.Similarly,wewouldnotexpectthattheratiooftheCEO’stotalannualcompensationtothatofthe medianemployeetobeanumberthatcanbecomparedtotheratiodeterminedbyothercompaniesinany meaningfulfashion.
OTHERMATTERS
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, management is not aware of any matters to be presented at the Annual MeetingofStockholdersotherthanthemattersspecificallystatedintheNoticeofAnnualMeetingofStockholders anddiscussedinthisProxyStatement.Ifanyothermatterormattersareproperlybroughtbeforethemeeting,the persons named in the enclosed Proxy Form have discretionary authority to vote the proxy on each such matter in accordance with their judgement.
|
| 89 |
SOLICITATIONANDEXPENSESOFSOLICITATION
Thesolicitationofproxieswillbemadeinitiallythroughtheinternetandbye-mail.TheCompany’sDirectors,Executive Officers and employees may also solicit proxies in person, via computer, by telephone or email without additional compensation. In addition, proxies may be solicited by certain banking institutions, brokerage firms, custodians, trustees, nominees, and fiduciaries that will mail material to or otherwise communicate with the beneficial owners of shares of the Company’s Common Stock. All expenses of solicitation of proxies will be paid by the Company.
ANNUALREPORTTOSTOCKHOLDERS
A copy of the Company’s 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 is now available to stockholders via the internet at www.envisionreports.com/iosp. Stockholders who require a printed copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K may obtain one by writing to or calling our investor relations department: Investor Relations, Innospec Inc., Corporate Headquarters. 8310 South Valley Highway, Suite 350. Englewood, Colorado 80112, telephone +1 303-792-5554, or by e-mail to [email protected].
|
| 90 |
STOCKHOLDERS’PROPOSALSFORTHE2027ANNUALMEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TheCompanyanticipatesholdingits2027AnnualMeetingofStockholdersonMay7, 2027.
UndertheregulationsoftheSEC,anystockholderwishingtomakeaproposaltobeacteduponatthe2027Annual MeetingofStockholdersandhaveitincludedinourproxymaterialsmustpresentsuchproposalstotheSecretaryof the Company no later than November 27, 2026.
StockholderproposalsorDirectornominationsnotincludedinaproxystatementforanannualmeetingmustcomply with the advance notice procedures and information requirements set out in the Bylaws of the Company in order tobeproperlybroughtbeforethatAnnualMeetingofStockholders.UndertheCompany’sBylaws,anystockholder desiring to make a proposal to be acted upon at the 2027 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must present such proposals to the Corporate Secretary not before February 8, 2027 and not later than March 10, 2027. In addition, to comply with the universal proxy rules (once effective), stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than Innospec Inc. nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than March 10, 2027.
ByorderoftheBoard:
DavidB.Jones
SeniorVicePresident,GeneralCounsel,
ChiefComplianceOfficer,andCorporateSecretary
March26,2026
PLEASEVOTEVIATHEINTERNETORBYTELEPHONEINACCORDANCEWITHTHEINSTRUCTIONSONYOUR
NOTICEORPROXY CARD.ALTERNATIVELY, IF YOUHAVEREQUESTEDWRITTENMATERIALSSIGN, DATEAND
RETURNYOURPROXYCARDIN THERETURNENVELOPEPROVIDED.
|
|
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. |
![]() |
Your vote matters – here’s how to vote!
You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card.
|
Votes submitted electronically must be received by 11:59 p.m., ET, on May 7, 2026. |
|
Online Go to www.envisionreports.com/iosp or scan the QR code — login details are located in the shaded bar below. | |
|
Phone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada |
|
Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.envisionreports.com/iosp |
| 2026 Annual Meeting Proxy Card | ||
![]() |
IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. | ![]() |
| A | Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. |
| 1. Election of two Class I Directors: | |
| For | Withhold | For | Withhold | ||||||||||
| 01 - Elizabeth K. Arnold | ![]() |
![]() |
02 - Claudia P. Poccia | ![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
| For | Against | Abstain | For | Against | Abstain | ||
| 2. ADVISORY APPROVAL OF INNOSPEC’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3. RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| B | Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be count. — Please date and sign below. |
Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.
| Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. | Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. | Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. | ||
| / / |
![]() |
1 U P X |
![]() | |||
| 048AUB |
2026 Annual Meeting Admission Ticket
2026 Annual Meeting of Innospec Inc. Stockholders
Friday,
May 8 2026, 10:00 a.m. EST
at The St Regis Hotel
Two East 55th Street
At Fifth Avenue, New York City, NY, 10022, US
Upon arrival, please present this admission ticket and photo identification at the registration desk.
Important
notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
The material is available
at: www.envisionreports.com/iosp
|
Small steps make an impact. Help
the environment by consenting to receive electronic |
|
|
IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. | ![]() |
![]() | ||
| Innospec Inc. | ||
Notice of 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting — May 8, 2026
Patrick S. Williams and Ian P. Cleminson, or any of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Innospec Inc. to be held on May 8, 2026 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof.
Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the stockholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR all nominees and FOR Proposals 2 and 3.
In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
(Items to be voted appear on reverse side)
| C | Non-Voting Items |
| Change of Address — Please print new address below. | Comments — Please print your comments below. | |
![]() |
![]() | ||||



